The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 3.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
Fiserv FISV
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $52.31
Fiserv holds its Distribution at $52.31.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 15 days |
| Price | $52.31 |
| Valuation | 8.87 trailing · 5.85 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | N/A |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 20% discount to our $63.00 fair value.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
Does not pass. Business activity screen
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Payment Plumbing Runs Into Ethical Barrier
Fiserv sits behind countless bank transfers and card transactions that keep everyday finance moving. We pass on the name despite the 5.7 times forward earnings multiple and 24 percent gap between the 50.63 dollar share price and our 63 dollar fair value mark. The ethical screen returns a clear fail on business activity grounds, which overrides any surface appeal.
Twenty seven analysts carry a consensus hold rating with a median target of 63 dollars that matches our own reading. That alignment changes nothing once the screen has spoken.
The exposure centres on whatever activity triggered the fail and the chance of added regulatory or reputational drag that could hit cash flows later. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 5.9x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Trailing P/E | 8.9x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Market cap | $27.9B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on FISV
- › Truist Financial Earnings Beat Estimates but Eyes Are on Bank’s Next Chapter Barrons.com · 12d ago
- › Truist’s Rogers: Lyons CEO appointment brings ‘certainty’ Banking Dive · 12d ago
- › Cantor Sees PayPal Worth More Than the $60.50 Bid GuruFocus.com · 13d ago
- › 3 Cash-Producing Stocks We Keep Off Our Radar StockStory · 13d ago
- › PayPal Stock Jumps on Report of $53 Billion Takeover Bid Barrons.com · 13d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in FISV's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
FISV trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-18 | TODD PAUL M | Chief Financial Officer | 45,231 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | LYONS MICHAEL P | Chief Executive Officer | 309,158 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | ROSMAN ADAM L | Officer | 65,665 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | BEST KENNETH | Officer | 15,871 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | GELB ANDREW | Officer | 62,094 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | SURYADEVARA DHIVYA | Chief Executive Officer | 101,572 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | GEORGAKOPOULOS PANAGIOTIS | President | 182,512 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | LYONS MICHAEL P | Chief Executive Officer | 13,176 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | ROSMAN ADAM L | Officer | 7,981 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | GELB ANDREW | Officer | 8,669 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 15 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $54.39 | -1.9% | · | $981 | -1.9% |
| 2 months | $56.09 | -4.9% | · | $951 | -4.9% |
| 3 months | $56.07 | -4.8% | · | $952 | -4.8% |
| 6 months | $68.16 | -21.7% | · | $783 | -21.7% |
| 1 year | $168.81 | -68.4% | · | $316 | -68.4% |
| 2 years | $149.60 | -64.3% | · | $357 | -64.3% |
| 3 years | $116.82 | -54.3% | · | $457 | -54.3% |
| 5 years | $110.20 | -51.6% | · | $484 | -51.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.