The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Fiserv
FISV · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $25.3B
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 23 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 6 days ago
Screened 2026-10-23 · the tape above runs as of 07:18 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price49.86 USD at the 23 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read markup
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans slightly to calls (put/call 0.70)
- Last reviewed23 Oct 2026 (6 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 49.86 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 56.50, over the last year.
- Trend Markup
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political buying, disclosed 2026-09-25
- Options put/call open interest 0.70, read 2026-10-27
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markup label.
Fiserv holds its Markup at $49.86. The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 22 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 22 days |
| Price at the screen | $49.86 |
| Valuation | 9.13 trailing · 5.94 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Fiserv does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-28. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when FISV's ethical verdict changes
Today FISV does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 13% discount to our $56.50 fair value.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-23 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 13.3% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 26 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +13% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-23 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsPayment Plumbing Runs Into Ethical Barrier
Fiserv sits behind countless bank transfers and card transactions that keep everyday finance moving. We pass on the name despite the 5.7 times forward earnings multiple and 24 percent gap between the 50.63 dollar share price and our 63 dollar fair value mark. The ethical screen returns a clear fail on business activity grounds, which overrides any surface appeal.
Twenty seven analysts carry a consensus hold rating with a median target of 63 dollars that matches our own reading. That alignment changes nothing once the screen has spoken.
The exposure centres on whatever activity triggered the fail and the chance of added regulatory or reputational drag that could hit cash flows later. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 5.9xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| Trailing P/E | 9.1xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| 52-week range | 43.87 - 128.78 |
| Market cap | $25.3B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeFISV trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markdown to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 4.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 12.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 0.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 3.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $70.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Stocktwits Fintech Pulse: US Fintech Weekly Briefing And Market Drivers Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- AI Future of Banking: Finastra CEO Chris Walters, Live from Money 20/20 2026 Yahoo Finance · 5d ago
- Fiserv Appoints Raj Seshadri to Board of Directors Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- 'Big Short' Investor Michael Burry Bumps Up Substack Subscription Price, Flags 4 'Busted' Bear-Market Havens Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- Fiserv (FISV) Stock Still Looks Like A Bargain After Lawsuit Claims Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-18 | TODD PAUL M | Chief Financial Officer | 45,231 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | LYONS MICHAEL P | Chief Executive Officer | 309,158 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | ROSMAN ADAM L | Officer | 65,665 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | BEST KENNETH | Officer | 15,871 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | GELB ANDREW | Officer | 62,094 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | SURYADEVARA DHIVYA | Chief Executive Officer | 101,572 | · | |
| 2026-02-18 | GEORGAKOPOULOS PANAGIOTIS | President | 182,512 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | LYONS MICHAEL P | Chief Executive Officer | 13,176 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | ROSMAN ADAM L | Officer | 7,981 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | GELB ANDREW | Officer | 8,669 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-11 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-11 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $54.39 | -1.9% | · | $981 | -1.9% |
| 2 months | $56.09 | -4.9% | · | $951 | -4.9% |
| 3 months | $56.07 | -4.8% | · | $952 | -4.8% |
| 6 months | $68.16 | -21.7% | · | $783 | -21.7% |
| 1 year | $168.81 | -68.4% | · | $316 | -68.4% |
| 2 years | $149.60 | -64.3% | · | $357 | -64.3% |
| 3 years | $116.82 | -54.3% | · | $457 | -54.3% |
| 5 years | $110.20 | -51.6% | · | $484 | -51.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever FISV does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.