The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 5.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $75.
Edison International EIX
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Edison International, through its subsidiaries, engages in the generation and distribution of electric power.
read at $78.64
Edison International holds its Markup at $78.64.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $78.64 |
| Valuation | 8.55 trailing · 12.08 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.65 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 6% discount to our $83.33 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 7.70% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
| Revenue growth | 7.70% |
| Profit margin | 18.12% |
| Debt to equity | 226.10 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 14 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 44.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 4.9% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 1.7% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 1.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
California power with a debt overhang
Every time the lights flick on across southern California the cash moves through Edison's network, yet the company carries more debt than its regulated returns can safely handle.
We pass on Edison International. Revenue grows at 8 percent with an 18 percent profit margin and 19 percent return on equity, but the business fails our ethical screen on its debt ratio. A forward multiple of 11.9 times earnings and a moderate moat do not change the call.
Risk sits in the leverage that leaves little room for rate shocks or wildfire costs in its service area. Analysts rate it a hold with targets near the current price. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 12.1x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 8.5x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | 7.7% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 18.1% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 18.9% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 2.26 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 0.74 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.65 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $30.3B |
| Employees | 13,725 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on EIX
- › 3 Signs You are a Value Investor (and 3 Stocks to Buy) Zacks · 16d ago
- › EIX or OGE: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now? Zacks · 18d ago
- › Are Investors Undervaluing Edison International (EIX) Right Now? Zacks · 18d ago
- › Edison International (EIX) Hit a 52 Week High, Can the Run Continue? Zacks · 18d ago
- › Why Edison International (EIX) Could Beat Earnings Estimates Again Zacks · 19d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in EIX's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
EIX trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $75.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | GRANHOLM JENNIFER M | Director | 2,737 | · | |
| 2026-04-23 | SMITH CAREY A | Director | 2,737 | · | |
| 2026-04-13 | TAYLOR PETER J | Director | 500 | $37,650 | |
| 2026-03-02 | TAYLOR PETER J | Director | 500 | $37,270 | |
| 2026-03-02 | ANDERSON JILL CHARLOTTE | Officer | 6,885 | $514,088 | |
| 2026-03-02 | ANDERSON JILL CHARLOTTE | Officer | 52,873 | $3,149,583 | |
| 2026-02-25 | PIZARRO PEDRO J | Chief Executive Officer | 47,033 | · | |
| 2026-02-25 | MURPHY J ANDREW | Officer | 4,393 | · | |
| 2026-02-25 | RIGATTI MARIA C | Chief Financial Officer | 10,546 | · | |
| 2026-02-25 | CHOI CAROLINE | Officer | 4,182 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $70.58 | +1.3% | · | $1,013 | +1.3% |
| 2 months | $75.72 | -5.6% | · | $944 | -5.6% |
| 3 months | $70.11 | +2.0% | $0.88 | $1,032 | +3.2% |
| 6 months | $56.41 | +26.8% | $1.76 | $1,299 | +29.9% |
| 1 year | $47.61 | +50.2% | $3.41 | $1,573 | +57.3% |
| 2 years | $66.59 | +7.4% | $6.63 | $1,173 | +17.3% |
| 3 years | $58.41 | +22.4% | $9.66 | $1,390 | +39.0% |
| 5 years | $45.78 | +56.2% | $15.27 | $1,895 | +89.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.