The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 21.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 0%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (28 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $142.
Dollar General DG
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Dollar General Corporation, a discount retailer, provides various merchandise products in the southern, southwestern, midwestern, and eastern United States.
read at $123.22
Dollar General holds its Markup at $123.22.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 117 days |
| Price | $123.22 |
| Valuation | 17.43 trailing · 15.39 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.25 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 7% discount to our $132.20 fair value, weak competitive moat, 3.40% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
| Revenue growth | 3.40% |
| Profit margin | 3.63% |
| Debt to equity | 178.65 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 29 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 50.8% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 3.7% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Bargain hunters meet a debt trap
Walk into any Dollar General and the shelves tell a simple story. Everyday items move in volume yet the business behind them carries too much debt to pass a basic ethical screen. We pass for that reason alone.
Revenue edges forward at just 3 percent while margins sit at 4 percent. Return on equity looks respectable at 19 percent but a weak moat and forward earnings multiple of 15.7 times leave little room for error when the fair value sits only a few dollars above the current price.
The real concern is leverage. High debt loads amplify any slowdown in footfall or rise in costs, and the market already prices the shares near analyst targets. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.4x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 17.4x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 3.4% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 3.6% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 18.9% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.79 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.17 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.25 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $27.2B |
| Employees | 194,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on DG
- › Five Below Jumps 41% in a Year: Should You Still Buy the Stock? Zacks · 12d ago
- › Walmart Commands a 36.74X Forward P/E: Is the Stock Worth Buying? Zacks · 13d ago
- › Is Costco Stock Still a Buy After Its June Sales Update? Zacks · 13d ago
- › Dollar General copies Costco with inflation-proof deal TheStreet · 13d ago
- › Dollar General (DG) Stock Drops Despite Market Gains: Important Facts to Note Zacks · 14d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in DG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
DG trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 0%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (28 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $142.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-26 | ELLIOTT ANITA C | Officer | 3,523 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | VASOS TODD JOSEPH | Chief Executive Officer | 40,260 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | TAYLOR RHONDA M | General Counsel | 6,710 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | TAYLOR EMILY C | Chief Operating Officer | 12,581 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | WEST RODERICK J | Officer | 8,388 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | HERRMANN TRACEY N | Officer | 6,710 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | LAU DONNY H. | Chief Financial Officer | 10,065 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | WHEELER BRYAN D | Officer | 5,704 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | WENKOFF CARMAN R | Chief Technology Officer | 6,710 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | REARDON KATHLEEN A | Officer | 6,710 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-05-05 | Brian Babin | Republican | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2 Jun2026 | John Curtis | Republican | buy | 250K–500K |
| 2 Jun2026 | John Curtis | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $104.63 | +4.3% | · | $1,043 | +4.3% |
| 2 months | $115.73 | -5.7% | · | $943 | -5.7% |
| 3 months | $135.31 | -19.3% | $0.59 | $811 | -18.9% |
| 6 months | $131.49 | -17.0% | $1.18 | $839 | -16.1% |
| 1 year | $109.03 | +0.1% | $2.36 | $1,023 | +2.3% |
| 2 years | $121.96 | -10.5% | $4.72 | $934 | -6.6% |
| 3 years | $143.70 | -24.0% | $7.08 | $809 | -19.1% |
| 5 years | $193.08 | -43.5% | $11.13 | $623 | -37.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.