The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 3.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
Conagra Brands
CAG · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $6.9B · 18,300 employees
Conagra Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a consumer packaged goods food company primarily in the United States.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 4 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-04 · the tape above runs as of 14:03 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price15.27 USD at the 4 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readFair vs our fair value, as of 4 Nov 2026
- Our regime readMarkup, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 1.01)
- Last reviewed4 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $11.98 to $19.46, base estimate $13.74 (screen dated 2026-11-04).
- Trend Markup
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 1.01, read 2026-11-01
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markup label.
Conagra Brands holds its Markup at $15.27. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 11 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 11 days |
| Price at the screen | $15.27 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 9.62 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.00 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 38.54% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 38.5% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 4.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 4.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.02% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Conagra Brands's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 39% of the company, just over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when CAG's ethical verdict changes
Today CAG does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Fair vs our fair value, as of 4 Nov 2026: it trades above our $13.74 fair value estimate, weak competitive moat.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-04 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 11.1% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 15 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits −8% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $13.74, with a range of $11.98 to $19.46, dated to the 2026-11-04 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsPackaged food shelves hide weak returns and debt
Walk down any supermarket aisle and the familiar brands sit on every shelf. Yet Conagra carries a debt load that trips the ethical screen while posting a negative 17% profit margin and negative 25% return on equity. Revenue edges up just 4% and the moat looks weak, so the business earns an AVOID rating despite a modest 7% gap to fair value.
The forward multiple of 9.1 times offers little comfort once peak earnings risk and thin growth enter the frame. Sixteen analysts sit on hold with a median target matching the current price, confirming the market sees no obvious catalyst. Currency moves or input costs could quickly widen the gap between reported numbers and cash reality.
High leverage remains the core ethical failure here, and cyclical packaged-food margins have a habit of disappointing when volumes soften. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.6xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | -3.98 |
| EPS, forward | 1.50 |
| Revenue growth | -1.4%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | -17.0%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -24.9%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 6.10% |
| Dividend yield | 991.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.21a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.10adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.00barely tracks the market's swings |
| Short interest, float | 0.11% |
| 52-week range | 12.53 - 20.32 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $6.9B |
| Employees | 18,300 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeCAG trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 1.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16. Since the last review it its composite score eased.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 0.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
The framework has shifted from markdown to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 4.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 4.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 9.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 36%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (17 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Why Is Conagra Brands (CAG) Up 6.7% Since Last Earnings Report? Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- Nomad Foods (NOMD) vs. KHC and LW: Can Management’s Heavy Stock Buying Signal a Turnaround Opportunity? Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- 5 Dividend Stocks with the Highest Yield Yahoo Finance · 12d ago
- 4 High-Yield Dividends That Could Be Next on the Chopping Block Yahoo Finance · 12d ago
- Conagra Has Already Cut Its Dividend. Can Kraft Heinz Avoid the Same Fate? Yahoo Finance · 12d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-14 | MULLIGAN JOHN J | Director | 17,500 | $250,402 | |
| 2026-03-02 | MULLIGAN JOHN J | Director | 3,228 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | SATRIANO PIETRO | Director | 3,228 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | MARSHALL RUTH ANN | Director | 1,629 | $31,250 | |
| 2025-12-01 | MARSHALL RUTH ANN | Director | 1,768 | $31,250 | |
| 2025-11-04 | NAPIER MELISSA C | Officer | 13,011 | $223,659 | |
| 2025-10-07 | BROWN THOMAS K | Director | 10,000 | $187,200 | |
| 2025-09-02 | MARSHALL RUTH ANN | Director | 1,664 | $31,250 | |
| 2025-07-24 | MARBERGER DAVID S | Chief Financial Officer | 11,419 | $220,387 | |
| 2025-07-24 | CONNOLLY SEAN | Chief Executive Officer | 42,935 | $828,646 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-28 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-07-13 | Rick Scott | Republican | sell | 100K–250K |
| 2026-06-30 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-06-16 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $13.93 | -4.5% | · | $955 | -4.5% |
| 2 months | $14.81 | -10.1% | $0.35 | $922 | -7.8% |
| 3 months | $15.77 | -15.6% | $0.35 | $866 | -13.4% |
| 6 months | $16.83 | -21.0% | $0.70 | $832 | -16.8% |
| 1 year | $20.65 | -35.6% | $1.40 | $712 | -28.8% |
| 2 years | $25.60 | -48.0% | $2.80 | $629 | -37.1% |
| 3 years | $28.68 | -53.6% | $4.20 | $610 | -39.0% |
| 5 years | $28.94 | -54.0% | $6.77 | $694 | -30.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever CAG does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.