The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
BBWI · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $3.9B · 9,071 employees
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-04
Screened 2026-09-04 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its distribution label.
Bath & Body Works, Inc. holds its Distribution at $19.51. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 37 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 37 days |
| Price at the screen | $19.51 |
| Valuation | 5.12 trailing · 6.96 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.38 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 135.05% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 135.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 25.98% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 26.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 21% discount to our $23.61 fair value, weak competitive moat.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-04 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 21.0% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 15 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +13% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-04 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsDebt burden outweighs any bargain in bath products
Every time someone reaches for a three wick candle or a bottle of lotion the retailer behind it is already carrying more debt than its balance sheet can comfortably support. We pass because the company fails the ethical screen on that leverage, leaving no margin for the kind of shocks that hit specialty retail hard.
Revenue is shrinking three percent while the forward multiple sits at seven times earnings. That looks cheap until you remember this is a cyclical business with a weak moat and margins that can compress quickly when spending slows. The fifteen analysts see it as a hold with targets barely above the current price, which tells you the market is not pricing in much recovery.
High debt plus negative growth creates exactly the sort of value trap that appears attractive on paper but rarely rewards patience. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 7.0xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| Trailing P/E | 5.1xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | 3.81 |
| EPS, forward | 2.80 |
| Revenue growth | -2.3%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 10.8%thin but positive margins |
| FCF yield | 19.44% |
| Dividend yield | 427.00% |
| Current ratio | 1.20adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.38moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.07% |
| 52-week range | 14.28 - 32.03 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $3.9B |
| Employees | 9,071 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeBBWI trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $26. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 4.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $26.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 19.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $26.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $26.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-19 | MAZUREK THOMAS E | Officer | 6,616 | · | |
| 2026-03-12 | MAZUREK THOMAS E | Officer | 40,921 | · | |
| 2026-03-12 | HEAF DANIEL | Chief Executive Officer | 212,993 | · | |
| 2026-03-12 | BORATTO EVA C | Chief Financial Officer | 115,815 | · | |
| 2025-11-24 | NASH SARAH E | Director | 10,000 | $155,800 | |
| 2025-11-24 | SYMANCYK JAMES KEVIN | Director | 22,500 | $350,550 | |
| 2025-11-21 | VOSKUIL STEVEN E | Director | 20,000 | $300,700 | |
| 2025-11-21 | STEINOUR STEPHEN D | Director | 6,700 | $99,528 | |
| 2025-11-21 | HONDAL FRANCIS A | Director | 3,343 | $50,128 | |
| 2025-11-21 | BRADY LUCY | Director | 3,469 | $49,962 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $18.95 | -4.4% | $0.20 | $966 | -3.4% |
| 2 months | $17.90 | +1.2% | $0.20 | $1,023 | +2.3% |
| 3 months | $18.57 | -2.5% | $0.20 | $986 | -1.4% |
| 6 months | $19.55 | -7.4% | $0.40 | $946 | -5.4% |
| 1 year | $25.63 | -29.4% | $0.80 | $738 | -26.2% |
| 2 years | $42.80 | -57.7% | $1.60 | $460 | -54.0% |
| 3 years | $38.82 | -53.4% | $2.40 | $528 | -47.2% |
| 5 years | $48.09 | -62.4% | $3.90 | $458 | -54.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever BBWI does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.