The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
National Vision Holdings, Inc.
EYE · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $1.3B · 13,138 employees
National Vision Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as an optical retailer in the United States.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 5 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-05 · the tape above runs as of 18:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price17.85 USD at the 5 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readUndervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Our regime readMarkup, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans heavily to calls (put/call 0.01)
- Last reviewed5 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $19.87 to $33.12, base estimate $26.75 (screen dated 2026-11-05).
- Trend Markup
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.01, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markup label.
National Vision Holdings, Inc. holds its Markup at $17.85. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 56 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 56 days |
| Price at the screen | $17.85 |
| Valuation | 26.13 trailing · 13.45 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.98 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 51.24% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 51.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 2.86% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 2.9% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
National Vision Holdings,'s business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 51% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when EYE's ethical verdict changes
Today EYE does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Undervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026: it trades at roughly a 33% discount to our $26.75 fair value, weak competitive moat, 2.50% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-05 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 33.3% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 10 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +51% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $26.75, with a range of $19.87 to $33.12, dated to the 2026-11-05 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsCheap Specs Chain Trips Over Debt Load
Picture a family picking up new glasses at a strip-mall chain. The purchase feels ordinary, yet the retailer behind the counter carries a debt burden that our ethical screen simply will not accept. National Vision therefore fails at the first gate, regardless of any apparent discount to our internal value.
The numbers do not rescue the story. Revenue growth of just 7 percent, a 2 percent profit margin and 5 percent ROE all point to a weak moat in a crowded retail lane. A forward multiple of 17.5 times offers no cushion once the debt constraint is recognised, and the buy-rated analyst targets sit outside our mandate.
High leverage remains the binding risk, leaving the business exposed to any slowdown in consumer spending or rise in interest costs. We pass.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.5xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 26.1xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 0.62 |
| EPS, forward | 1.20 |
| Revenue growth | +2.5%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 2.5%barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 5.8%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 3.80% |
| Debt to equity | 0.78moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 0.59below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.98steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.28% |
| 52-week range | 14.75 - 30.02 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $1.3B |
| Employees | 13,138 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeEYE trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 10.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 4.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markdown to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 2.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 1.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 13.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 8.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 34.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (11 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $29.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- National Vision Holdings, Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- 3 US Consumer Stocks to Watch as Strong Spending Tests Household Budgets Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- AXIL Brands' Product Launch & Strong Liquidity: Buy or Hold? Yahoo Finance · 25d ago
- National Vision Launches 2026-2027 Scholarship Program, Exploring the Balance Between Innovation and Human Connection Yahoo Finance · 25d ago
- EYE or CL: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now? Yahoo Finance · 28 Sep 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | BRANDMAN JARED | Officer | 1,890 | · | |
| 2026-03-31 | LADEN CHRISTOPHER | Chief Financial Officer | 26,082 | · | |
| 2026-03-11 | WILKES ALEXANDER | Chief Executive Officer | 35,000 | $928,900 | |
| 2026-03-06 | FAHS LEONARD READE | Officer and Director | 11,672 | $345,217 | |
| 2026-03-06 | BRANDMAN JARED | Officer | 10,279 | · | |
| 2026-03-06 | CLARK BILL | Officer | 8,224 | · | |
| 2026-03-06 | VANDETTE JOSEPH | Officer | 8,224 | · | |
| 2026-03-06 | BANNER MARK | Officer | 13,706 | · | |
| 2026-03-06 | WILKES ALEXANDER | Chief Executive Officer | 27,412 | · | |
| 2026-03-06 | PATEL PRITI V | Officer | 8,224 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-11 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-11 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-11 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-04 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-07-07 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $21.80 | -19.9% | · | $801 | -19.9% |
| 2 months | $25.67 | -32.0% | · | $680 | -32.0% |
| 3 months | $25.93 | -32.7% | · | $673 | -32.7% |
| 6 months | $29.25 | -40.3% | · | $597 | -40.3% |
| 1 year | $21.02 | -16.9% | · | $831 | -16.9% |
| 2 years | $14.33 | +21.8% | · | $1,218 | +21.8% |
| 3 years | $26.08 | -33.1% | · | $670 | -33.1% |
| 5 years | $48.27 | -63.8% | · | $362 | -63.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever EYE does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.