The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 18.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 14%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $96.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation BAH
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $65.21
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation holds its Distribution at $65.21.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $65.21 |
| Valuation | 9.45 trailing · 9.47 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 0.36 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | -6.50% |
| Profit margin | 7.59% |
| Debt to equity | 373.03 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 12 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 43.9% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 9.4% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Government contractor looks cheap until the debt bites
Booz Allen helps agencies keep systems running, yet the same contracts have left the balance sheet carrying too much debt. That single ethical red flag ends any interest here, even though the forward multiple sits at 9.5 times and return on equity reaches 81 percent. Revenue is already falling 6 percent, so the headline numbers offer no cushion once leverage is taken into account.
The 9 percent gap between the current price and our fair value looks attractive on paper, and analysts still cluster around an 80 dollar target. Moderate competitive protection and an 8 percent profit margin cannot offset the structural problem flagged by the screen. We therefore pass without hesitation.
High return on equity often flatters firms that borrow heavily to buy back shares. When revenue is shrinking, that leverage becomes a genuine risk rather than a clever tactic. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.5x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Trailing P/E | 9.5x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | -6.5% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 7.6% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 80.7% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 3.73 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.78 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.36 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $7.8B |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in BAH's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
BAH trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 14%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $96.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-26 | METZFIELD DENNIS | Officer | 350 | $27,506 | |
| 2025-12-30 | LABEN NANCY J | Officer | 5,829 | · | |
| 2025-12-30 | METZFIELD DENNIS | Officer | 1,175 | · | |
| 2025-10-30 | ROZANSKI HORACIO | Chief Executive Officer | 23,800 | $2,014,908 | |
| 2025-08-04 | ROSSOTTI CHARLES OSSOLA | Director | 3,097 | · | |
| 2025-08-04 | JOHNSON ARTHUR E | Director | 2,020 | · | |
| 2025-08-04 | FLOURNOY MICHELE ANGELIQUE | Director | 3,276 | · | |
| 2025-08-04 | DIAL DEBRA L | Director | 2,020 | · | |
| 2025-08-04 | READ RORY P | Director | 3,097 | · | |
| 2025-08-04 | JEWETT ELLEN | Director | 2,020 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $74.95 | +4.6% | · | $1,046 | +4.6% |
| 2 months | $78.17 | +0.3% | · | $1,003 | +0.3% |
| 3 months | $77.11 | +1.7% | · | $1,017 | +1.7% |
| 6 months | $93.67 | -16.3% | $0.59 | $843 | -15.7% |
| 1 year | $98.21 | -20.2% | $2.24 | $821 | -17.9% |
| 2 years | $145.97 | -46.3% | $4.32 | $567 | -43.3% |
| 3 years | $97.97 | -20.0% | $6.24 | $864 | -13.6% |
| 5 years | $80.35 | -2.4% | $9.54 | $1,094 | +9.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.