The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 22.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is holding around 26% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 135%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $212.
Albemarle Corporation ALB
Clears both ethical standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Albemarle Corporation provides energy storage solutions worldwide.
read at $120.78
Albemarle Corporation holds its Distribution at $120.78.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 7 days |
| Price | $120.78 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 9.53 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 88.8 |
| Beta | 1.35 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads OPPORTUNITY — it trades at roughly a 26% discount to our $151.53 fair value, weak competitive moat, 32.70% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 32.70% |
| Profit margin | -4.24% |
| Debt to equity | 19.85 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 20 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 20.1% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.4% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 13.5% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Lithium boom meets a classic cycle trap
Picture the battery boom as a giant wave that lifts every lithium producer one year and buries half of them the next. Albemarle rides that wave with 33 percent revenue growth, yet it is posting a negative 4 percent profit margin and minus 2 percent return on equity right now. The forward multiple of 9.5 times looks cheap next to a 26 percent margin of safety to our fair value, and the ethical screen clears without issue.
What stands out is the scale in energy storage chemicals at a time when electric vehicles keep taking share. Twenty analysts still cluster around a buy rating with a 196 dollar median target, well above the current 120 dollar price. The business has real volume leverage if lithium demand holds.
The catch is the cycle itself. Low multiples in specialty chemicals often signal peak earnings rather than a bargain, and a weak moat leaves the firm exposed when prices turn. Currency swings and capacity additions elsewhere can erase the apparent discount fast. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.5x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Revenue growth | 32.7% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | -4.2% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -1.8% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 0.20 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 2.07 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.35 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $14.2B |
| Employees | 7,800 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in ALB's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
ALB trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is holding around 26% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 135%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $212.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is holding around 26% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 135%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $212.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | MASTERS JERRY KENT JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 16,393 | $3,011,766 | |
| 2026-04-01 | WOLFF ALEJANDRO DANIEL | Director | 25 | · | |
| 2026-03-12 | MASTERS JERRY KENT JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 30,716 | $5,000,258 | |
| 2026-03-10 | MASTERS JERRY KENT JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 11,783 | $2,012,688 | |
| 2026-03-02 | LABAUVE DONALD J JR | Officer | 698 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | NORRIS ERIC S. | Officer | 4,490 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | SHEOREY NEAL RAVI | Chief Financial Officer | 4,490 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | LIMA CYNTHIA RENEE | Officer | 1,796 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | MUMMERT MARK RICHARD | Officer | 3,143 | · | |
| 2026-03-02 | MASTERS JERRY KENT JR. | Chief Executive Officer | 22,450 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 5 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 26 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 21 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-28 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $209.99 | -29.5% | · | $705 | -29.5% |
| 2 months | $173.64 | -14.7% | · | $853 | -14.7% |
| 3 months | $163.49 | -9.4% | $0.41 | $908 | -9.2% |
| 6 months | $133.85 | +10.6% | $0.81 | $1,112 | +11.2% |
| 1 year | $63.09 | +134.7% | $1.62 | $2,373 | +137.3% |
| 2 years | $110.11 | +34.5% | $3.24 | $1,374 | +37.4% |
| 3 years | $210.75 | -29.7% | $4.84 | $726 | -27.4% |
| 5 years | $160.77 | -7.9% | $7.60 | $968 | -3.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.