The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 5.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $88.
American International Group
AIG · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $39.2B · 22,100 employees
American International Group, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-09
Screened 2026-09-09 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markdown label.
American International Group holds its Markdown at $75.03. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 129 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 129 days |
| Price at the screen | $75.03 |
| Valuation | 13.69 trailing · 8.54 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.51 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 35% discount to our $101.00 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 0.50% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-09 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 34.6% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 20 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +17% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-09 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsAIG carries ethical flags that markets ignore
Every claim paid or premium collected by AIG moves through a vast insurance network that touches ordinary lives daily. Analysts see a cheap forward multiple near 9 times earnings and a modest revenue uptick, yet the numbers sit alongside a narrow moat and single-digit returns on equity.
We pass because the business activity screen flags the company outright. That single ethical breach overrides any surface appeal from the 27 percent gap between the current price and our fair value estimate. Low growth and average profitability only reinforce the decision.
The real risk lies in how ethical screens can shift sentiment fast, even when earnings look steady. Twenty analysts still lean buy, but their targets do not address the core issue. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 8.5xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 13.7xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 5.48 |
| EPS, forward | 8.79 |
| Revenue growth | +0.5%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 11.1%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 7.2%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 18.77% |
| Dividend yield | 262.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.22minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.61below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.51steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.02% |
| 52-week range | 71.25 - 87.29 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $39.2B |
| Employees | 22,100 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeAIG trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 6.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $88.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $88.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $88.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- American International's Q2 2026 Earnings: What to Expect Barchart · 17 Jul 2026
- Piper Sandler revamps insurance playbook, upgrades Gallagher, cuts five ratings Investing.com · 15 Jul 2026
- How AI Is Becoming MetLife's Long-Term Competitive Advantage Zacks · 15 Jul 2026
- IBM downgraded, Cava upgraded: Wall Street's top analyst calls The Fly · 15 Jul 2026
- Where Analysts Pushed Back On PEP Stock's Latest Earnings Call Trefis · 14 Jul 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | NAVAGAMUWA ROSHAN | Chief Technology Officer | 19,704 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | HANCOCK JONATHAN LAWTON | Officer | 6,490 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | FRY CHARLES ANTHONY | Officer | 2,108 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | CARBONE KATHLEEN | Officer | 2,109 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | GLAZER ROSE MARIE E | General Counsel | 1,623 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | SCHAPER CHRISTOPHER | Officer | 2,365 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | NAVAGAMUWA ROSHAN | Chief Technology Officer | 5,189 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | FRY CHARLES ANTHONY | Officer | 27,446 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | LAFNITZEGGER KELLY | Officer | 5,675 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | TWININGDAVIS MELISSA | Officer | 5,675 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $76.06 | -2.0% | · | $980 | -2.0% |
| 2 months | $76.87 | -3.0% | · | $970 | -3.0% |
| 3 months | $76.03 | -2.0% | $0.45 | $986 | -1.4% |
| 6 months | $81.93 | -9.0% | $0.90 | $921 | -7.9% |
| 1 year | $82.48 | -9.6% | $1.80 | $926 | -7.4% |
| 2 years | $72.79 | +2.4% | $3.40 | $1,071 | +7.1% |
| 3 years | $53.25 | +40.0% | $4.84 | $1,491 | +49.1% |
| 5 years | $46.45 | +60.5% | $7.40 | $1,764 | +76.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever AIG does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.