The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 6.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $88.
American International Group AIG
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · American International Group, Inc.
read at $79.16
American International Group holds its Markup at $79.16.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 270 days |
| Price | $79.16 |
| Valuation | 13.94 trailing · 8.96 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.54 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 29% discount to our $102.00 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 1.40% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 1.40% |
| Profit margin | 11.84% |
| Debt to equity | 22.65 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 20 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
AIG carries ethical flags that markets ignore
Every claim paid or premium collected by AIG moves through a vast insurance network that touches ordinary lives daily. Analysts see a cheap forward multiple near 9 times earnings and a modest revenue uptick, yet the numbers sit alongside a narrow moat and single-digit returns on equity.
We pass because the business activity screen flags the company outright. That single ethical breach overrides any surface appeal from the 27 percent gap between the current price and our fair value estimate. Low growth and average profitability only reinforce the decision.
The real risk lies in how ethical screens can shift sentiment fast, even when earnings look steady. Twenty analysts still lean buy, but their targets do not address the core issue. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.0x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 13.9x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 1.4% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 11.8% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 7.7% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.23 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.61 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.54 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $42.0B |
| Employees | 22,100 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on AIG
- › American International's Q2 2026 Earnings: What to Expect Barchart · 11d ago
- › Piper Sandler revamps insurance playbook, upgrades Gallagher, cuts five ratings Investing.com · 12d ago
- › How AI Is Becoming MetLife's Long-Term Competitive Advantage Zacks · 13d ago
- › IBM downgraded, Cava upgraded: Wall Street's top analyst calls The Fly · 13d ago
- › Where Analysts Pushed Back On PEP Stock's Latest Earnings Call Trefis · 14d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in AIG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
AIG trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $88.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $88.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | NAVAGAMUWA ROSHAN | Chief Technology Officer | 19,704 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | HANCOCK JONATHAN LAWTON | Officer | 6,490 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | FRY CHARLES ANTHONY | Officer | 2,108 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | CARBONE KATHLEEN | Officer | 2,109 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | GLAZER ROSE MARIE E | General Counsel | 1,623 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | SCHAPER CHRISTOPHER | Officer | 2,365 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | NAVAGAMUWA ROSHAN | Chief Technology Officer | 5,189 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | FRY CHARLES ANTHONY | Officer | 27,446 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | LAFNITZEGGER KELLY | Officer | 5,675 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | TWININGDAVIS MELISSA | Officer | 5,675 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $76.06 | -2.0% | · | $980 | -2.0% |
| 2 months | $76.87 | -3.0% | · | $970 | -3.0% |
| 3 months | $76.03 | -2.0% | $0.45 | $986 | -1.4% |
| 6 months | $81.93 | -9.0% | $0.90 | $921 | -7.9% |
| 1 year | $82.48 | -9.6% | $1.80 | $926 | -7.4% |
| 2 years | $72.79 | +2.4% | $3.40 | $1,071 | +7.1% |
| 3 years | $53.25 | +40.0% | $4.84 | $1,491 | +49.1% |
| 5 years | $46.45 | +60.5% | $7.40 | $1,764 | +76.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.