The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 4%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 14%. The street (13 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $71.
Tyson Foods TSN
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Tyson Foods, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a food company worldwide.
read at $61.18
Tyson Foods holds its Markup at $61.18.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 20 days |
| Price | $61.18 |
| Valuation | 47.80 trailing · 13.65 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 88.0 |
| Beta | 0.39 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads OPPORTUNITY — it trades at roughly a 29% discount to our $79.06 fair value, weak competitive moat, 4.40% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 4.40% |
| Profit margin | 0.81% |
| Debt to equity | 44.41 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 12 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 24.1% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Against market value it is 39.7%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 10.2% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.1% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Cheap Meat Processor With Room to Recover
Every supermarket shelf and restaurant menu depends on steady supplies of beef, pork and chicken. Tyson sits at the centre of that chain and trades at $57.77 against our fair value of $79.06, a 37 percent margin of safety. Forward earnings sit at just 12.9 times while revenue edges up 4 percent, numbers that suggest the market is overlooking a basic food business that clears the ethical screen.
The balance sheet shows modest returns, with a 1 percent profit margin and 3 percent ROE, yet the shares still look inexpensive next to the analyst median target of $68. Weak competitive protection means Tyson must keep fighting on cost and volume, but the defensive nature of the products gives it a floor that pure commodity plays lack.
Commodity swings and thin margins remain real threats, so any recovery depends on steady demand and cost control rather than sudden windfalls. The low multiple reflects those pressures, not hidden strength. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.7x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 47.8x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 4.4% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 0.8% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 2.6% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.44 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.83 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.39 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $21.5B |
| Employees | 133,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on TSN
- › Tyson Foods vs. Pilgrim's Pride: Which Protein Stock Is Better? Zacks · 15d ago
- › Bear of the Day: General Mills (GIS) Zacks · 16d ago
- › Oklahoma settles 20-year poultry-litter lawsuit Just Food · 18d ago
- › Conagra Brands Q4 Earnings on the Horizon: Key Factors to Note Zacks · 18d ago
- › 1 Mid-Cap Stock with Promising Prospects and 2 We Avoid StockStory · 18d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in TSN's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
TSN trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-06 | BRONCZEK DAVID J | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | TYSON BARBARA A | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | BEEBE MIKE D | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | TYSON OLIVIA | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | BOND SARAH R. | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | SCHOMBURGER JEFFREY K | Director | 3,754 | $245,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | QUINN KATHERINE B | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | BALEDGE LES R | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | WHITE NOEL W | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 | |
| 2026-02-06 | MARTINEZ MARIA N. | Director | 2,911 | $190,000 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $66.52 | -15.6% | $0.51 | $851 | -14.9% |
| 2 months | $65.09 | -13.8% | $0.51 | $870 | -13.0% |
| 3 months | $60.52 | -7.3% | $0.51 | $936 | -6.4% |
| 6 months | $58.59 | -4.2% | $1.02 | $975 | -2.5% |
| 1 year | $53.81 | +4.3% | $2.03 | $1,081 | +8.1% |
| 2 years | $52.33 | +7.2% | $4.02 | $1,149 | +14.9% |
| 3 years | $45.40 | +23.6% | $5.97 | $1,368 | +36.8% |
| 5 years | $66.22 | -15.3% | $9.70 | $994 | -0.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.