The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 4.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Planet Fitness, Inc.
PLNT · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $4.3B · 4,393 employees
Planet Fitness, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, franchises and operates fitness centers under the Planet Fitness brand.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 5 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-05 · the tape above runs as of 20:03 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price60.07 USD at the 5 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readUndervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Our regime readMarkup, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans heavily to calls (put/call 0.28)
- Last reviewed5 Nov 2026 (1 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $60.44 to $100.73, base estimate $71.29 (screen dated 2026-11-05).
- Trend Markup
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.28, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markup label.
Planet Fitness, Inc. holds its Markup at $60.07. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 61 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 61 days |
| Price at the screen | $60.07 |
| Valuation | 19.50 trailing · 15.65 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.03 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 93.49% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 93.5% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 2.84% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 2.8% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 13.41% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 13.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 1.74% | Below 5% | Only 1.7% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Planet Fitness,'s business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 93% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when PLNT's ethical verdict changes
Today PLNT does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Undervalued vs our fair value, as of 5 Nov 2026: it trades at roughly a 20% discount to our $71.29 fair value, 4.50% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-05 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 15.7% discount to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 16 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +3% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $71.29, with a range of $60.44 to $100.73, dated to the 2026-11-05 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsCheap gym chain with growth yet we pass
Walk into any Planet Fitness and the low fees pull in crowds who might otherwise skip the gym. Revenue is climbing 20% and margins sit at 18% with a forward multiple of just 14.6 times, while the ethical screen raises no flags. The setup looks tidy on paper.
Yet the opportunity rating stays at none. Unknown moat, heavy reliance on consumer wallets in a cyclical leisure sector, and analyst targets clustered around 62 dollars all point to limited edge once spending patterns shift. Fair value sits higher at 70 dollars but that gap alone does not override the structural caution.
Risk sits in the cyclical exposure and thin differentiation, where any slowdown in discretionary fitness spend could compress both growth and multiples quickly. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.7xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 19.5xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 2.94 |
| EPS, forward | 3.66 |
| Revenue growth | +4.5%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 18.3%healthy profit margins |
| FCF yield | 3.59% |
| Current ratio | 1.58healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 1.03moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.15% |
| 52-week range | 37.03 - 114.26 |
| Market cap | $4.3B |
| Employees | 4,393 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradePLNT trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 2.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 2.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 10.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 50%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $67.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Cinemark to Post Q3 Earnings: What's in the Cards for the Stock? Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- MAR Gears Up for Q3 Earnings: RevPAR and Fee Growth in Focus Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Planet Fitness (PLNT) Expected to Beat Earnings Estimates: Can the Stock Move Higher? Yahoo Finance · 8d ago
- Planet Fitness Honors First Responders Through Nationwide Equipment Donations Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
- OneSpaWorld (OSW) Beats Q3 Earnings and Revenue Estimates Yahoo Finance · 9d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $48.40 | +5.3% | · | $1,053 | +5.3% |
| 2 months | $70.40 | -27.6% | · | $724 | -27.6% |
| 3 months | $74.76 | -31.8% | · | $682 | -31.8% |
| 6 months | $108.57 | -53.1% | · | $470 | -53.1% |
| 1 year | $102.31 | -50.2% | · | $498 | -50.2% |
| 2 years | $71.23 | -28.4% | · | $716 | -28.4% |
| 3 years | $67.27 | -24.2% | · | $758 | -24.2% |
| 5 years | $75.16 | -32.2% | · | $678 | -32.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever PLNT does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.