The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 7.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (17 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $38.
Warner Music Group Corp
WMG · USD · Market cap $15.5B · 5,500 employees
Warner Music Group Corp.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-03
Screened 2026-09-03 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markup label.
Warner Music Group Corp holds its Markup at $29.55. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 18 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 18 days |
| Price at the screen | $29.55 |
| Valuation | 23.64 trailing · 15.00 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.29 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 46.88% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 46.9% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 19.05% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 19.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-03 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 39.3% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 17 covering, consensus None. The average target sits +32% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-03 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsStreaming royalties still leave labels exposed
Every time a listener streams a hit on Spotify or a creator licenses a track for a reel, Warner Music takes a slice through its recorded music and publishing arms. The business shows real momentum with 17% revenue growth and 51% ROE, yet we pass despite the 45% gap to our fair value. A narrow moat means platform deals and artist mobility can shift cash flows quickly.
The 6% profit margin underlines how little of that top-line growth reaches the bottom line once marketing and royalty splits are paid. At 14.5 times forward earnings the valuation looks reasonable on paper, but any slowdown in streaming or loss of key catalogues would compress returns fast.
Seventeen analysts carry a buy rating with a 39 dollar median target and the name clears our ethical screen, yet the opportunity rating remains none. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.0xpriced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 23.6xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 1.25 |
| EPS, forward | 1.97 |
| Revenue growth | +10.4%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 9.2%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 70.1%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 2.47% |
| Dividend yield | 267.00% |
| Debt to equity | 4.53heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 0.73below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.29moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.08% |
| 52-week range | 23.34 - 35.42 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $15.5B |
| Employees | 5,500 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (17 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $38.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $32.76 | -12.4% | $0.19 | $882 | -11.8% |
| 2 months | $28.34 | +1.2% | $0.19 | $1,019 | +1.9% |
| 3 months | $26.72 | +7.4% | $0.19 | $1,081 | +8.1% |
| 6 months | $27.52 | +4.3% | $0.38 | $1,056 | +5.6% |
| 1 year | $26.06 | +10.1% | $0.76 | $1,130 | +13.0% |
| 2 years | $29.26 | -1.9% | $1.48 | $1,031 | +3.1% |
| 3 years | $23.19 | +23.7% | $2.16 | $1,330 | +33.0% |
| 5 years | $31.40 | -8.6% | $3.40 | $1,022 | +2.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever WMG does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.