The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 32%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (16 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $37.
Supermicro SMCI
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Super Micro Computer, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops and sells server and storage solutions based on modular and open-standard architecture in the United States, Asia, Europe, and internationally.
read at $28.45
Supermicro holds its Distribution at $28.45.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 14 days |
| Price | $28.45 |
| Valuation | 15.72 trailing · 8.59 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.94 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 60% discount to our $45.62 fair value, weak competitive moat, 122.70% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 122.70% |
| Profit margin | 3.70% |
| Debt to equity | 120.80 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 16 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 34.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.8% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 52.6% of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
AI servers tempt but ethics block the way
Servers for AI training roll out of Supermicro factories at a furious pace with revenue up 123 percent. The 7.7 times forward earnings multiple screams value next to that surge. We pass for one clear reason.
Profit margins of 4 percent and a weak moat tell the real story behind the numbers. Fair value sits at 44 dollars yet the debt ratio blocks any interest.
Analyst targets cluster around 36 dollars and the ethical screen failure seals the decision. This is exactly what the screen is for. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 8.6x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 15.7x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 122.7% growing very fast |
| Profit margin | 3.7% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 17.9% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.21 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.66 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.94 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $18.4B |
| Employees | 6,238 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in SMCI's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
SMCI trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | LIU LIANG CHIU-CHU SARA | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 6,218 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | LIANG CHARLES | Chief Executive Officer | 6,218 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | CHEUNG KENNETH | Officer | 1,250 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | CLEGG DON W | Officer | 2,310 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | WEIGAND DAVID E | Chief Financial Officer | 4,170 | · | |
| 2026-05-08 | XIAO JIN | Officer | 6,068 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | LIU LIANG CHIU-CHU SARA | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 20,980 | $88,850 | |
| 2026-02-27 | LIANG CHARLES | Chief Executive Officer | 20,980 | $88,850 | |
| 2026-02-17 | LIU LIANG CHIU-CHU SARA | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 3,650 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | LIANG CHARLES | Chief Executive Officer | 3,650 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $33.52 | -12.7% | · | $873 | -12.7% |
| 2 months | $25.26 | +15.9% | · | $1,159 | +15.9% |
| 3 months | $30.90 | -5.3% | · | $947 | -5.3% |
| 6 months | $34.02 | -14.0% | · | $860 | -14.0% |
| 1 year | $42.91 | -31.8% | · | $682 | -31.8% |
| 2 years | $78.69 | -62.8% | · | $372 | -62.8% |
| 3 years | $26.17 | +11.9% | · | $1,119 | +11.9% |
| 5 years | $3.66 | +698.6% | · | $7,986 | +698.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.