The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 13% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
NGL Energy Partners LP
NGL · the NYSE · USD
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 23 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 8 days ago
Screened 2026-10-23 · the tape above runs as of 10:41 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price15.54 USD at the 23 Oct 2026 close
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans heavily to calls (put/call 0.35)
- Last reviewed23 Oct 2026 (8 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 15.54 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 7.92, over the last year.
- Trend Accumulation
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.35, read 2026-10-29
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its accumulation label.
NGL Energy Partners LP holds its Accumulation at $15.54. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 189 days.
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 189 days |
| Price at the screen | $15.54 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · N/A forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 0.66 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 147.42% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 147.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.31% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.3% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
NGL Energy Partners LP's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 147% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-30. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when NGL's ethical verdict changes
Today NGL does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-23 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 51.4% above the base estimate.
Where it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-23 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsMidstream energy bet that looks cheap but isn't
Picture a trucker loading barrels at a shale site, only to watch prices swing 50% in a year while the partnership carries a mountain of debt just to keep the pipes flowing. NGL Energy Partners shows revenue sliding 13%, negative profit margins and an ROE of minus 52%, yet trades at 17.8 times forward earnings against a fair value half its current price. The moderate moat cannot offset the ethical screen failure on leverage or the fact this is a classic cyclical value trap where low multiples often signal peak earnings about to roll over.
We pass because the combination of high debt, shrinking volumes and an overvalued multiple leaves no margin of safety, regardless of any short-term energy price spike. Investors chasing the headline yield or apparent cheapness usually discover the trap when the cycle turns and cash flow evaporates faster than the balance sheet can handle.
Risk sits in the leverage and energy price exposure, both of which the numbers already flag as unsustainable. Analysis, not advice.
| EPS, trailing | -3.28 |
| Revenue growth | +59.1%growing very fast |
| Profit margin | -3.8%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -37.7%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 63.12heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.14adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.66steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.04% |
| 52-week range | 5.71 - 19.06 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeNGL trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 5.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 13% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 13% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markdown to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 13% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 12% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 9.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 60% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%.
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 3.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 60% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 6.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 60% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%.
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 4.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 60% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%.
Our analysis reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 60% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 295%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 40%.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-26 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | buy | 500K–1M |
| 2026-08-26 | Diana Harshbarger | Republican | buy | 500K–1M |
| 2026-08-21 | Michael McCaul | Republican | buy | 500K–1M |
| 2026-08-21 | Michael McCaul | Republican | buy | 500K–1M |
| 2026-06-22 | Ann Wagner | Republican | buy | 250K–500K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $16.76 | -5.3% | · | $948 | -5.3% |
| 2 months | $13.54 | +17.3% | · | $1,173 | +17.3% |
| 3 months | $11.00 | +44.4% | · | $1,444 | +44.4% |
| 6 months | $9.77 | +62.5% | · | $1,625 | +62.5% |
| 1 year | $4.02 | +295.0% | · | $3,950 | +295.0% |
| 2 years | $5.50 | +188.7% | · | $2,887 | +188.7% |
| 3 years | $3.86 | +311.4% | · | $4,114 | +311.4% |
| 5 years | $2.35 | +575.7% | · | $6,757 | +575.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever NGL does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.