The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 10.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $203.
Marsh McLennan
MRSH · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $81.7B · 95,000 employees
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., a professional services company, provides advisory services and insurance solutions to clients in the areas of risk, strategy, and people worldwide.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-25 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 11 days ago
Screened 2026-09-25 · the tape above runs as of 09:09 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 171.12 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 186.58, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political selling, disclosed 2026-09-14
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Marsh McLennan holds its Distribution at $171.12. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days |
| Price at the screen | $171.12 |
| Valuation | 20.87 trailing · 15.00 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.58 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Marsh McLennan does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 9% discount to our $186.58 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 6.20% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-25 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 9.0% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 21 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +18% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-25 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsGlobal Risk Broker Hits Ethical Wall
Think of the firm that helps multinationals price everything from hurricane damage to cyber threats. Marsh McLennan sits in that seat, delivering 8 percent revenue growth, a 14 percent profit margin and 28 percent ROE at a forward multiple of 16.1 times.
Those figures sit close to our fair value of 184.66 dollars, yet the ethical screen rules it out on business activity grounds. Moderate moat or not, the fail is decisive and leaves the modest 1 percent margin of safety irrelevant.
Analyst targets cluster near 200 dollars and the buy rating looks tempting on paper alone, but the ethical block overrides any cyclical or valuation debate. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.0xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 20.9xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 8.20 |
| EPS, forward | 11.41 |
| Revenue growth | +6.2%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 14.2%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 25.9%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 5.86% |
| Dividend yield | 221.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.45a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.14adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.58steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.01% |
| 52-week range | 156.60 - 207.83 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $81.7B |
| Employees | 95,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeMRSH trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $203.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 15.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $203.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $203.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 22%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $203. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- 3 Insurance Stocks Retail Investors Are Watching As War Risk Costs Rise Simply Wall St. · 16d ago
- AJG's McMillan Insurance Acquisition Adds to Brokerage Expansion Zacks · 18d ago
- Employer Health Costs Surge: What it Means for EHTH, CNC & UNH Zacks · 18d ago
- Is Marsh & McLennan Stock Underperforming the S&P 500? Barchart · 18d ago
- Insider Sale: CEO Dumps More Than 16,000 Shares of Financial Stock Motley Fool · 19d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | MILLS STEVEN A | Director | 264 | $42,398 | |
| 2026-03-13 | TOMLINSON PATRICK | Officer | 1,228 | · | |
| 2026-03-11 | JONES JOHN JUDE | Officer | 2,362 | $410,067 | |
| 2026-03-04 | DOYLE JOHN Q | Chief Executive Officer | 16,655 | $3,052,862 | |
| 2026-03-04 | DOYLE JOHN Q | Chief Executive Officer | 16,655 | · | |
| 2026-03-03 | STUDER NICHOLAS MARK | Officer | 3,837 | $706,123 | |
| 2026-02-27 | MILLS STACY | Officer | 2,723 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | FERNANDEZ CARMEN | Officer | 6,970 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | BESWICK PAUL | Chief Technology Officer | 6,970 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | STUDER NICHOLAS MARK | Chief Executive Officer | 8,044 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-14 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-14 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-09 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 100K–250K |
| 2026-09-09 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 100K–250K |
| 2026-09-02 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $161.58 | +3.5% | · | $1,035 | +3.5% |
| 2 months | $168.15 | -0.5% | · | $995 | -0.5% |
| 3 months | $170.01 | -1.6% | $0.90 | $989 | -1.1% |
| 6 months | $181.61 | -7.9% | $1.80 | $931 | -6.9% |
| 1 year | $214.02 | -21.8% | $3.60 | $799 | -20.1% |
| 2 years | $202.71 | -17.5% | $6.86 | $859 | -14.1% |
| 3 years | $169.90 | -1.5% | $9.70 | $1,042 | +4.2% |
| 5 years | $128.75 | +29.9% | $14.20 | $1,410 | +41.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever MRSH does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.