The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 17.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 43%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (16 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $76.
Brown & Brown
BRO · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $20.2B · 22,888 employees
Brown & Brown, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-28 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 8 days ago
Screened 2026-09-28 · the tape above runs as of 09:09 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 60.24 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 74.69, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political selling, disclosed 2026-08-25
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Brown & Brown holds its Distribution at $60.24. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 22 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 22 days |
| Price at the screen | $60.24 |
| Valuation | 19.25 trailing · 12.48 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.58 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Brown & Brown does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 24% discount to our $74.69 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 32.40% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-28 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 24.0% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 16 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +28% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-28 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsInsurance broker fails ethical screen test
Picture every policy sold in America. The broker stands in the middle, skimming a fee while the underwriter takes the real risk. Brown & Brown has lifted revenue 36 percent, yet that growth sits beside a clear ethical fail on the business activity screen.
We pass for that single reason. Forward earnings trade at 14.3 times with an 18 percent profit margin and 12 percent return on equity, numbers that look steady but cannot override the screen. The moderate moat and consensus hold rating near $73 add little once ethics close the door.
Insurance brokerage can turn cyclical fast when rates soften or claims spike. A modest valuation offers no cushion if earnings peak and multiples compress further. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 12.5xcheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 19.2xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 3.13 |
| EPS, forward | 4.83 |
| Revenue growth | +32.4%strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 18.1%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 10.0%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 8.15% |
| Dividend yield | 114.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.64moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.13adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.58steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.05% |
| 52-week range | 53.81 - 96.55 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $20.2B |
| Employees | 22,888 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeBRO trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 5.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 43%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (16 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $73.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 17.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 43%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (16 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $73.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 43%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (16 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $73.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- AJG's McMillan Insurance Acquisition Adds to Brokerage Expansion Zacks · 18d ago
- BRO Stock Declines 27.1% in a Year: What Should Investors Do Now? Zacks · 20d ago
- WTW Stock Trading at a Discount to Industry at 14.73X: Time to Hold? Zacks · 20d ago
- Here’s Why This Fund Sold Brown & Brown (BRO) Insider Monkey · 20d ago
- 1 S&P 500 Stock to Own for Decades and 2 We Brush Off StockStory · 20d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | MASOJADA BRONISLAW EDMUND | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | SAVIO KATHLEEN A | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | PATEL JAYMIN B | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | KRUMP PAUL J | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | JOHNSON JOIA M | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | MAIN TIMOTHY R M | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | HUNT JAMES S | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | GELLERSTEDT LAWRENCE L III | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | HOEPNER THEODORE J JR | Director | 2,434 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | REILLY WENDELL S | Director | 2,434 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | buy | 250K–500K |
| 2026-09-03 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | buy | 250K–500K |
| 2026-08-31 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-31 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-26 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $55.35 | +8.4% | $0.17 | $1,087 | +8.7% |
| 2 months | $64.89 | -7.5% | $0.17 | $927 | -7.3% |
| 3 months | $67.45 | -11.0% | $0.17 | $892 | -10.8% |
| 6 months | $79.14 | -24.2% | $0.33 | $762 | -23.8% |
| 1 year | $104.56 | -42.6% | $0.65 | $580 | -42.0% |
| 2 years | $88.36 | -32.1% | $1.23 | $693 | -30.7% |
| 3 years | $62.69 | -4.3% | $1.73 | $985 | -1.5% |
| 5 years | $50.37 | +19.1% | $2.58 | $1,243 | +24.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever BRO does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.