The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 9.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $19.
Accelerant Holdings ARX
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Accelerant Holdings, together with its subsidiaries, operates a data-driven risk exchange that connects selected specialty insurance underwriters with risk capital partners.
read at $13.52
Accelerant Holdings holds its Markup at $13.52.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 165 days |
| Price | $13.52 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 14.65 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | N/A |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 18% discount to our $15.92 fair value, weak competitive moat, 59.70% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 59.70% |
| Profit margin | -150.61% |
| Debt to equity | 16.77 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 9 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Financial sector: insurance Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 0.0% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Insurance broker fails ethical test before numbers even register
Picture an exchange built to match specialty underwriters with outside capital in places where traditional insurers hesitate. Accelerant Holdings sits at that intersection yet trips our ethical screen on business activity, which alone rules it out regardless of any other metric. The company posts 60% revenue growth but cannot turn that into profit, posting a -151% margin and -243% return on equity, so the growth story never reaches the bottom line.
Forward earnings sit at 14.6 times while the moat remains weak and the shares trade below our fair value with an 18% margin of safety. Nine analysts still carry a buy rating and an $18 median target, yet we pass because the ethical failure overrides any valuation gap or analyst consensus. High growth without positive returns or competitive protection simply does not compensate for the red flag already raised.
Currency, regulatory and execution risks in the Cayman structure add further layers of uncertainty that the weak moat cannot offset. The business model may sound efficient on paper but the combination of losses and the ethical breach leaves no room for consideration. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.6x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Revenue growth | 59.7% growing very fast |
| Profit margin | -150.6% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -243.2% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 0.17 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 11.25 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Market cap | $3.0B |
| Employees | 862 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to Cayman Islands and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in ARX's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
ARX trades on the NYSE (the company is based in Cayman Islands). As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $19.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $19.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | WAINWRIGHT SIMON | Director | 23,316 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | STERNBERG MATTHEW DAVID | Officer | 279,329 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | MERIWETHER KAREN SUE | Director | 11,658 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | HASLEY NANCY | Director | 11,658 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | LITTLE PAUL CHRISTOPHER | Director | 11,658 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | TALACH DAVID GEORGE PAUL | Director | 23,316 | · | |
| 2026-03-23 | GREEN JAY MICHAEL | Chief Financial Officer | 50,000 | $638,285 | |
| 2026-03-18 | RADKE JEFFREY L | Chief Executive Officer | 300,171 | · | |
| 2026-03-18 | STERNBERG MATTHEW DAVID | Officer | 180,667 | · | |
| 2026-03-18 | ONEILL FRANCIS JAMES | Officer | 128,644 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $13.36 | +8.3% | · | $1,083 | +8.3% |
| 2 months | $12.77 | +13.3% | · | $1,133 | +13.3% |
| 3 months | $10.77 | +34.4% | · | $1,344 | +34.4% |
| 6 months | $15.73 | -8.0% | · | $920 | -8.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.