The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
Lufax Holding Ltd
LU · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $997M · 33,163 employees
Lufax Holding Ltd engages in the retail credit and enablement business to borrowers and institutions in the People's Republic of China.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 13 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 24 days ago
Screened 2026-10-13 · the tape above runs as of 14:04 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price0.92 USD at the 13 Oct 2026 close
- Fair valueUnder review: its inputs are 23 days old; our model's value is 2.12x the price, above our 2.00x limit.
- Our regime readMarkdown, as of 5 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans slightly to calls (put/call 0.95)
- Last reviewed13 Oct 2026 (24 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: range not available (screen dated 2026-10-13).
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options put/call open interest 0.95, read 2026-11-02
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Lufax Holding Ltd holds its Markdown at $0.92. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 7 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 7 days |
| Price at the screen | $0.92 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 5.97 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.67 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity: conventional financial services
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Its core business involves an activity the values screen does not clear. | Fail |
| Debt load | 4,138.40% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 4,138.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 1,393.01% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing cash and securities are 1,393.0% of assets, above the one-third limit. | Fail |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 73.14% | Below 5% | 73.1% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Lufax does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when LU's ethical verdict changes
Today LU does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Fair value under review. Its inputs are 23 days old; our model's value is 2.12x the price, above our 2.00x limit. We show no fair value, margin of safety or value read built on it until the review clears.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
The Street's RangeThird-party analyst targets. The average target sits +136% from the screen price.
Where our models see it going: no fair-value estimate yet, range not available, dated to the 2026-10-13 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsChinese Lender Trips Over Debt and Direction
Picture a borrower in Shanghai tapping an app for a quick loan while the economy cools. Lufax sits in the middle, yet shrinking revenue and negative profit margins show the platform struggling to keep pace with tighter rules and weaker demand.
We pass because the ethical screen flags a failed debt ratio test and the business carries a weak moat. Forward earnings look cheap at 5.2 times but sit alongside 20 percent revenue declines, negative return on equity and no analyst consensus to lean on.
The real danger lies in further regulatory tightening and currency swings that could widen losses quickly. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 6.0xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | -0.39 |
| EPS, forward | 0.19 |
| Revenue growth | -11.3%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | -7.8%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -2.3%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | -223.23% |
| Debt to equity | 0.89moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 34.60comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.67steadier than the market |
| 52-week range | 1.15 - 4.57 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $997M |
| Employees | 33,163 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; its business and earnings are exposed to China and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeLU trades on the NYSE (the company is based in China). As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 6.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 14.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 6.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
Our analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 11.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
The framework has shifted from markdown to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 4.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 54%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $3.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Lufax (LU) Narrowed Its Loss 86%. Was the Improvement Mostly Tax-Driven? Insider Monkey · 22 Aug 2026
- Lufax H1 Earnings Call Highlights MarketBeat · 19 Aug 2026
- Lufax Holding (LU) Is Down 6.3% After Cluster Of Senior Director Exits And Board Reshuffle Simply Wall St. · 7 Aug 2026
- This Hedge Fund Just Dumped Its Entire Stake in XPeng Stock. Should You Too? Motley Fool · 26 May 2026
- Assessing Lufax Holding (NYSE:LU) Valuation As Weak Earnings Contrast With Low Price To Sales Ratio Simply Wall St. · 10 May 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-29 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-29 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $1.97 | -32.2% | · | $678 | -32.2% |
| 2 months | $1.88 | -29.0% | · | $710 | -29.0% |
| 3 months | $2.23 | -40.1% | · | $599 | -40.1% |
| 6 months | $2.70 | -50.6% | · | $494 | -50.6% |
| 1 year | $2.90 | -54.0% | · | $460 | -54.0% |
| 2 years | $2.30 | -42.0% | · | $580 | -42.0% |
| 3 years | $2.73 | -51.1% | $2.58 | $1,432 | +43.2% |
| 5 years | $17.96 | -92.6% | $4.82 | $342 | -65.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever LU does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.