The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 4%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $310.
Labcorp LH
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Labcorp Holdings Inc.
read at $314.23
Labcorp holds its Markup at $314.23.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days |
| Price | $314.23 |
| Valuation | 26.67 trailing · 16.19 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.86 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 8% discount to our $340.00 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 5.80% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
| Revenue growth | 5.80% |
| Profit margin | 6.66% |
| Debt to equity | 83.41 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 17 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 35.5% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.8% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 14.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Routine blood tests mask rising debt risks
Think of Labcorp as the quiet lab behind every GP visit and hospital ward, running the tests that decide treatments. The business delivers steady 6% revenue growth and a 7% profit margin, yet it fails our ethical screen on debt levels.
We pass for that reason alone. A narrow moat, 11% ROE and forward earnings at 14.6 times do not offset the leverage issue, even with a reported 20% gap to our $340 fair value. Analyst chatter around a $320 target changes nothing.
The real concern is whether current margins hold if interest costs climb or volumes soften. Cyclical healthcare spending offers little cushion. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 16.2x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 26.7x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 5.8% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 6.7% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 11.0% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.83 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.73 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.86 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $25.8B |
| Employees | 71,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on LH
- › CVS Health Corporation (CVS) Soars to 52-Week High, Time to Cash Out? Zacks · 16d ago
- › New Study Reveals Strongest State Economies, Only 1 State Was Better Than Texas 24/7 Wall St. · 18d ago
- › Will Strength in Biotechnology Unit Continue to Drive DHR's Growth? Zacks · 23d ago
- › Here's What to Expect From Labcorp Holdings’ Next Earnings Report Barchart · 29d ago
- › LH or CRL: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now? Zacks · 30d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in LH's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
LH trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | SCHECHTER ADAM H | Chief Executive Officer | 5,903 | $1,502,314 | |
| 2026-03-27 | WILKINSON PETER J | Officer | 1,633 | $436,093 | |
| 2026-03-27 | MELTZER JONATHAN C | Officer | 839 | $224,055 | |
| 2026-03-26 | KYLE KATHRYN W | Officer | 1,584 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | VAUGHN BRYAN T | Officer | 1,584 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | VAN DER VAART SANDRA DILLARD | Officer | 6,382 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | CAVENEY BRIAN J | Officer | 11,290 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | SCHROEDER MARK S | Chief Operating Officer | 12,272 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | SUMMY AMY B | Officer | 3,994 | · | |
| 2026-03-26 | BAILEY MEGAN D | Officer | 1,184 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Feb2025 | Tim Walberg | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 15 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $254.38 | +5.3% | $0.72 | $1,056 | +5.6% |
| 2 months | $260.21 | +3.0% | $0.72 | $1,032 | +3.2% |
| 3 months | $262.19 | +2.2% | $0.72 | $1,024 | +2.4% |
| 6 months | $263.34 | +1.7% | $1.44 | $1,023 | +2.3% |
| 1 year | $256.66 | +4.4% | $2.88 | $1,055 | +5.5% |
| 2 years | $191.58 | +39.8% | $5.76 | $1,428 | +42.8% |
| 3 years | $180.28 | +48.6% | $8.64 | $1,534 | +53.4% |
| 5 years | $211.08 | +26.9% | $11.73 | $1,325 | +32.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.