The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 15% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 56%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 31%. The street (3 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $59.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc. IFS
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Intercorp Financial Services Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides banking, insurance, wealth management, and payment services for retail and commercial clients in Peru.
read at $59.46
Intercorp Financial Services Inc. holds its Markup at $59.46.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 6 days |
| Price | $59.46 |
| Valuation | 11.05 trailing · 9.00 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.54 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 24.80% |
| Profit margin | 35.92% |
| Analyst consensus | None · 3 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: bank. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: bank Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Peruvian Bank Looks Cheap But Ethics Block It
Every time a shop owner in Lima needs credit or a family buys life cover, the cash moves through local banks that still dominate Peru's financial system. Intercorp Financial Services sits right in that flow, offering loans, deposits, insurance and wealth products with revenue up 25 percent and a 36 percent profit margin. On paper the 9 times forward earnings and 18 percent ROE look attractive next to the $59 share price.
We are staying away, for one reason that has nothing to do with the numbers. The ethical screen flags the entire bank sector as prohibited, so the opportunity rating stays at none regardless of the 25 percent margin of safety to our internal fair value. Analyst targets sit near $66, yet that is irrelevant once the screen is triggered.
Currency swings, political noise and credit cycles in emerging markets would add real risk even if the ethics allowed it. This is exactly what the screen is for. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.0x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 11.1x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 24.8% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 35.9% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 18.0% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Beta | 0.54 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $6.6B |
| Employees | 9,229 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to Peru and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in IFS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
IFS trades on the NYSE (the company is based in Peru). As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $44.44 | +19.9% | · | $1,199 | +19.9% |
| 2 months | $48.85 | +9.1% | $1.80 | $1,128 | +12.8% |
| 3 months | $42.98 | +24.0% | $1.80 | $1,281 | +28.1% |
| 6 months | $39.89 | +33.6% | $1.80 | $1,381 | +38.1% |
| 1 year | $34.08 | +56.4% | $1.80 | $1,616 | +61.6% |
| 2 years | $20.91 | +154.8% | $2.80 | $2,682 | +168.2% |
| 3 years | $20.75 | +156.8% | $3.80 | $2,751 | +175.1% |
| 5 years | $19.84 | +168.5% | $7.38 | $3,057 | +205.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.