The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is holding around 19% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 127%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 37%. The street (8 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $24.
Fastly, Inc. FSLY
Clears both ethical standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Fastly, Inc.
read at $20.72
Fastly, Inc. holds its Markup at $20.72.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 14 days |
| Price | $20.72 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 52.52 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.34 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 19.80% |
| Profit margin | -15.79% |
| Debt to equity | 40.71 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 9 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Edge platform still paying for growth
Picture a developer pushing code live and needing it to load instantly in Tokyo or Berlin without a central server bottleneck. Fastly built the pipes for that kind of speed, yet the business still burns cash while revenue grows only 20 percent. At 52.5 times forward earnings the market is paying a premium for a company that posted a 16 percent negative profit margin and negative 11 percent return on equity.
We pass because the numbers do not support the price. Fair value sits 21 percent below the current level and the opportunity rating is none, even though the ethical screen clears. High multiples on unprofitable growth leave little room for the execution slips common in this corner of infrastructure software.
The main risks are continued losses and the chance that bigger cloud providers simply absorb the edge workload. Analyst targets sit higher, yet those forecasts have not yet translated into sustainable returns for shareholders. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 52.5x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Revenue growth | 19.8% steady growth |
| Profit margin | -15.8% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -10.7% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 0.41 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 3.00 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.34 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $3.2B |
| Employees | 1,140 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in FSLY's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
FSLY trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $19.58 | -6.4% | · | $936 | -6.4% |
| 2 months | $23.07 | -20.6% | · | $794 | -20.6% |
| 3 months | $24.22 | -24.4% | · | $756 | -24.4% |
| 6 months | $10.43 | +75.7% | · | $1,757 | +75.7% |
| 1 year | $8.08 | +126.7% | · | $2,267 | +126.7% |
| 2 years | $7.48 | +144.9% | · | $2,449 | +144.9% |
| 3 years | $16.61 | +10.3% | · | $1,103 | +10.3% |
| 5 years | $54.38 | -66.3% | · | $337 | -66.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.