The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 2.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 39%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (15 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $203.
Electronic Arts EA
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Electronic Arts Inc.
read at $209.07
Electronic Arts holds its Accumulation at $209.07.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · screen not yet scored
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 145 days |
| Price | $209.07 |
| Valuation | 59.56 trailing · 21.71 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | Not scored · score 0.0 |
| Beta | 0.64 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 0% discount to our $210.00 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 11.90% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our model and the Street both land near today's price — fairly valued, with no strong edge either way.
| Revenue growth | 11.90% |
| Profit margin | 11.78% |
| Debt to equity | 27.41 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 14 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This security has not been fully scored against the values screen yet.
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 15.8% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.9% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 22.8% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Electronic Arts trades at almost no discount
Millions queue up for the latest FIFA or Battlefield release every year, yet Electronic Arts offers almost nothing in the way of a bargain. The shares sit within a whisker of our fair value at a forward multiple of 21.7 times, with revenue growing 12 percent and margins stuck at 12 percent. Moderate moat, 13 percent return on equity and a consensus hold rating tell the same story: steady but unexciting, with no margin of safety.
We pass for the simple reason that price and value have met. Revenue purity concerns leave the ethical screen inconclusive, so there is no extra credit on governance or product lines to tilt the balance.
Gaming demand can swing hard with new console cycles and player fatigue, and a moderate moat leaves room for rivals to chip away. The lack of discount removes the usual cushion against those swings. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 21.7x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 59.6x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 11.9% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 11.8% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 13.5% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.27 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.05 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.64 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $52.4B |
| Employees | 14,600 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on EA
- › What Does the Electronic Arts CEO's Sale of Company Shares Worth $1 Million Mean for Investors? Motley Fool · 11d ago
- › Electronic Arts (EA) After Battlefield 6 News Is The Stock Fully Valued Simply Wall St. · 11d ago
- › Sector Update: Consumer Stocks Decline Late Afternoon MT Newswires · 11d ago
- › Electronic Arts (EA) Stock Could Be 28% Overvalued As College Football Backlash Forces Changes Simply Wall St. · 12d ago
- › Market Chatter: Electronic Arts Deal Expected to Get EU Approval Under Foreign Subsidy Rules MT Newswires · 12d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in EA's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
EA trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 39%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (15 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $203.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | WILSON ANDREW | Chief Executive Officer | 2,240 | $450,482 | |
| 2026-05-15 | KELLY ERIC CHARLES | Officer | 5,518 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | CANFIELD STUART | Chief Financial Officer | 10,937 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | MIELE LAURA KAREN | Officer | 18,852 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | SINGH VIJAYANTHIMALA | Officer | 13,815 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | SCHATZ JACOB J | Officer | 13,815 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | WILSON ANDREW | Chief Executive Officer | 44,800 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | WILSON ANDREW | Chief Executive Officer | 5,000 | $1,002,709 | |
| 2026-05-15 | SINGH VIJAYANTHIMALA | Officer | 1,200 | $240,972 | |
| 2026-05-15 | MIELE LAURA KAREN | Officer | 2,500 | $501,344 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 8 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | sell | 100K–250K |
| 8 Apr2026 | Mike Kelly | Republican | buy | 50K–100K |
| 7 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 7 Feb2025 | Tim Walberg | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $200.03 | +1.6% | $0.19 | $1,017 | +1.7% |
| 2 months | $202.55 | +0.3% | $0.19 | $1,004 | +0.4% |
| 3 months | $198.89 | +2.2% | $0.19 | $1,023 | +2.3% |
| 6 months | $203.28 | 0.0% | $0.38 | $1,001 | +0.1% |
| 1 year | $146.58 | +38.6% | $0.76 | $1,391 | +39.1% |
| 2 years | $134.98 | +50.5% | $1.52 | $1,517 | +51.7% |
| 3 years | $124.09 | +63.8% | $2.28 | $1,656 | +65.6% |
| 5 years | $142.60 | +42.5% | $3.74 | $1,451 | +45.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.