The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 4.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 18% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21.
Healthpeak Properties
DOC · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $14.5B · 411 employees
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-09
Screened 2026-09-09 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markdown label.
Healthpeak Properties holds its Markdown at $20.39. Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 32 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 32 days |
| Price at the screen | $20.39 |
| Valuation | 58.26 trailing · 145.64 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.99 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 49.88% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 49.9% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 3.95% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 3.9% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 2.68% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 2.7% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades above our $12.60 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 11.10% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-09 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 38.2% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 19 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +13% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-09 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsHealthcare REIT trips on debt and weak returns
Healthpeak owns medical buildings across the United States. We pass on the name because the shares trade above our fair value and the ethical screen flags the debt ratio straight away.
Revenue rises 7 percent yet the forward multiple has turned negative at minus 150 times while return on equity sits at just 3 percent and profit margins reach only 8 percent. A narrow moat offers little protection when those returns stay this low.
High debt remains the core problem and leaves the business exposed if rates stay elevated or occupancy slips. Nineteen analysts may lean buy but the combination of thin returns and the ethical fail tells us to stay clear. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 145.6xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 58.3xexpensive: the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| EPS, trailing | 0.35 |
| EPS, forward | 0.14 |
| Revenue growth | +11.1%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 8.2%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 3.0%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 11.38% |
| Dividend yield | 621.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.09a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.29comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.99steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.04% |
| 52-week range | 15.70 - 22.95 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $14.5B |
| Employees | 411 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeDOC trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 13.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 18% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 18% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | BOHN SCOTT R | Officer | 10,989 | $213,740 | |
| 2026-05-06 | SANDSTROM KATHERINE M | Director | 9,744 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK | Director | 9,744 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | LIAS-BOOKER AVA E. | Director | 9,744 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | CONNOR JAMES B | Director | 9,744 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | GRIFFIN R KENT JR | Director | 9,744 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | CARTWRIGHT BRIAN G. | Director | 9,744 | · | |
| 2026-05-06 | WEISS RICHARD A | Director | 9,744 | · | |
| 2026-02-06 | THOMAS JOHN T | Director | 23,739 | · | |
| 2026-01-28 | ALONSO LISA A | Officer | 4,284 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $19.66 | +4.0% | $0.10 | $1,045 | +4.5% |
| 2 months | $16.55 | +23.5% | $0.20 | $1,247 | +24.7% |
| 3 months | $16.61 | +23.0% | $0.31 | $1,249 | +24.9% |
| 6 months | $16.10 | +27.0% | $0.61 | $1,308 | +30.8% |
| 1 year | $16.41 | +24.5% | $1.22 | $1,320 | +32.0% |
| 2 years | $16.98 | +20.4% | $2.33 | $1,341 | +34.1% |
| 3 years | $17.13 | +19.3% | $3.53 | $1,399 | +39.9% |
| 5 years | $26.46 | -22.8% | $5.93 | $997 | -0.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever DOC does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.