The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 4.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 85%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (7 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $381.
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. AMG
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Affiliated Managers Group, Inc., through its affiliates, operates as an investment management company providing investment management services to mutual funds, institutional clients,retails and high net worth individuals…
read at $369.83
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. holds its Markup at $369.83.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 4 days |
| Price | $369.83 |
| Valuation | 15.18 trailing · 9.05 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.12 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 9.70% |
| Profit margin | 35.55% |
| Debt to equity | 73.42 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 7 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Asset manager trips the ethical screen
Picture a wealthy client wiring cash to a US fund platform. The money moves through layers of managers and custodians that sit squarely inside financial services. Affiliated Managers Group runs that exact model, and our screen rejects the whole sector on principle.
The numbers still catch the eye. Forward earnings sit at 9.1 times, revenue is rising 10 percent, margins reach 36 percent and return on equity hits 22 percent. Fair value sits well above the current price. None of that matters once the ethical line is crossed.
Currency moves, fee pressure and market swings add ordinary sector risk, yet the binding constraint remains the screen itself. We pass.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.1x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 15.2x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 9.7% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 35.5% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 21.8% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.73 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 65.55 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.12 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $9.8B |
| Employees | 5,600 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in AMG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
AMG trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 85%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (7 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $381.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 85%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (7 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $381.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Jun2026 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-05-05 | Brian Babin | Republican | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 15 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 1 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $301.28 | +12.5% | $0.01 | $1,125 | +12.5% |
| 2 months | $285.35 | +18.8% | $0.01 | $1,188 | +18.8% |
| 3 months | $270.42 | +25.3% | $0.01 | $1,253 | +25.3% |
| 6 months | $280.14 | +21.0% | $0.02 | $1,210 | +21.0% |
| 1 year | $183.19 | +85.0% | $0.04 | $1,850 | +85.0% |
| 2 years | $155.08 | +118.6% | $0.08 | $2,186 | +118.6% |
| 3 years | $147.93 | +129.1% | $0.12 | $2,292 | +129.2% |
| 5 years | $161.25 | +110.2% | $0.20 | $2,103 | +110.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.