The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 4.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 43%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 31%. The street (10 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $375.
Evercore Inc EVR
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Evercore Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an independent investment banking firm in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
read at $340.50
Evercore Inc holds its Accumulation at $340.50.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 51 days |
| Price | $340.50 |
| Valuation | 19.16 trailing · 14.63 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.49 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 100.30% |
| Profit margin | 16.40% |
| Debt to equity | 52.59 |
| Analyst consensus | None · 10 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: capital markets. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Excluded industry: Capital Markets Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Banks thrive on deals but ethics draw the line
Picture a top dealmaker helping companies raise billions across New York and London. Evercore sits in that seat, posting 100 percent revenue growth, a 42 percent return on equity and 16 percent profit margins while trading at 14.7 times forward earnings.
We pass anyway. The ethical screen rules out capital markets firms outright, so strong numbers and a narrow moat do not change the verdict. The shares sit only 8 percent below our fair value with a buy-rated analyst target at 390, yet none of that overcomes the sector exclusion.
Cyclical deal flow can swing sharply when markets turn, and a narrow moat leaves little defence if competition intensifies. Currency and regulatory shifts add further pressure in this business. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.6x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 19.2x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 100.3% growing very fast |
| Profit margin | 16.4% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 42.2% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.53 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 2.22 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.49 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $13.2B |
| Employees | 2,635 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in EVR's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 43%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 31%. The street (10 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $375.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Feb2025 | Tim Walberg | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 15 Jun2026 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $334.52 | +3.2% | $0.89 | $1,035 | +3.5% |
| 2 months | $337.03 | +2.4% | $0.89 | $1,027 | +2.7% |
| 3 months | $266.50 | +29.5% | $0.89 | $1,299 | +29.9% |
| 6 months | $342.90 | +0.7% | $1.73 | $1,012 | +1.2% |
| 1 year | $241.98 | +42.7% | $3.41 | $1,441 | +44.1% |
| 2 years | $189.67 | +82.0% | $6.65 | $1,855 | +85.5% |
| 3 years | $115.42 | +199.1% | $9.73 | $3,075 | +207.5% |
| 5 years | $129.68 | +166.2% | $15.41 | $2,781 | +178.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.