The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 29%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (18 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $29.
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc ADR ZTO
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
read at $23.93
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc ADR holds its Markup at $23.93.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 54 days |
| Price | $23.93 |
| Valuation | 14.16 trailing · 10.51 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | -0.22 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 22.00% |
| Profit margin | 17.88% |
| Debt to equity | 34.66 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 18 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 12.6% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Against market value it is 119.7%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 17.2% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 13.2% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 1.5% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Parcels cross China but the edge stays thin
Think of ZTO as the local courier that moves boxes between factories and doorsteps across China every day. Revenue is rising 22 percent, margins sit at 18 percent and the forward multiple is just 10.5 times, so the shares look cheap next to our fair value of 32.59 against the current 23.92 price. Yet the moat is only narrow and the opportunity rating stays at none.
That leaves us passing. The business clears our ethical screen and analysts see upside to 30, but narrow competitive defences in a crowded market mean any growth edge can disappear quickly.
Risk sits mainly around China exposure, from sudden regulatory shifts to currency moves and local rivals that keep chipping away at returns. ROE of 15 percent is respectable yet nothing that screams durable advantage. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 10.5x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 14.2x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 22.0% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 17.9% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 14.9% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.35 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.64 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | -0.22 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $18.2B |
| Employees | 23,399 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to China and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in ZTO's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $25.01 | -10.3% | · | $897 | -10.3% |
| 2 months | $24.76 | -9.4% | · | $906 | -9.4% |
| 3 months | $23.12 | -2.9% | $0.39 | $987 | -1.3% |
| 6 months | $20.70 | +8.4% | $0.39 | $1,103 | +10.3% |
| 1 year | $17.34 | +29.4% | $0.39 | $1,316 | +31.6% |
| 2 years | $22.57 | -0.6% | $1.09 | $1,042 | +4.2% |
| 3 years | $24.96 | -10.1% | $1.71 | $967 | -3.3% |
| 5 years | $28.45 | -21.1% | $2.33 | $871 | -12.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.