The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 56%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (12 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $123.
Thomson-Reuters Corp TRI
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Thomson Reuters Corporation operates as a content and technology company in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.
read at $100.15
Thomson-Reuters Corp holds its Markup at $100.15.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 2 days |
| Price | $100.15 |
| Valuation | 26.15 trailing · 19.90 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | N/A |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 9.50% |
| Profit margin | 21.22% |
| Debt to equity | 26.44 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 12 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 13.2% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 8.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.5% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Trusted research tools but no real edge
Lawyers and accountants still reach for familiar platforms when they need verified data fast. Thomson Reuters delivers that service across legal, tax and news segments, with revenue rising 10 percent and margins holding at 20 percent. Yet the narrow moat and opportunity rating of none leave us with little reason to step in.
The forward multiple sits at 19.1 times earnings while return on equity runs at just 13 percent. A 15 percent margin of safety to fair value exists on paper, and the ethical screen clears, but the business shows no standout quality that would justify stretching for it now.
Currency moves, competition from newer platforms and modest returns on capital all sit in the risk column. The setup looks steady rather than compelling. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 19.9x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 26.1x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 9.5% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 21.2% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 14.2% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.26 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.51 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Market cap | $43.7B |
| Employees | 27,100 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to Canada and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on TRI
- › Wall Street Analysts Predict a 29.84% Upside in Thomson Reuters (TRI): Here's What You Should Know Zacks · 16 Jul 2026
- › INTU: Priced Like A Decline, Paying Like A Machine Trefis · 16 Jul 2026
- › Sector Update: Consumer Stocks Decline Late Afternoon MT Newswires · 14 Jul 2026
- › Sector Update: Consumer Stocks Decline Tuesday Afternoon MT Newswires · 14 Jul 2026
- › INTU Stock: Where Compounding Could Take The Price Trefis · 10 Jul 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in TRI's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 8 Jul2026 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 250K–500K |
| 6 May2026 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 500K–1M |
| 6 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 6 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $88.55 | -7.4% | $0.66 | $933 | -6.7% |
| 2 months | $81.39 | +0.7% | $2.09 | $1,033 | +3.3% |
| 3 months | $97.04 | -15.5% | $2.09 | $866 | -13.4% |
| 6 months | $127.96 | -36.0% | $2.75 | $662 | -33.8% |
| 1 year | $184.85 | -55.7% | $3.94 | $465 | -53.5% |
| 2 years | $162.17 | -49.5% | $6.21 | $544 | -45.6% |
| 3 years | $115.14 | -28.8% | $13.11 | $826 | -17.4% |
| 5 years | $88.88 | -7.8% | $16.82 | $1,111 | +11.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.