The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A. Technically it is holding around 29% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 588%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 48%. The street (5 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $138.
EchoStar SATS
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · EchoStar Corporation provides pay-tv services in the United States, Mexico, Canada, South and Central America, Asia, Africa, Australia, Europe, India, and the Middle East.
read at $103.92
EchoStar holds its Accumulation at $103.92.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 164 days |
| Price | $103.92 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · -911.54 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.96 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 26% discount to our $131.00 fair value, weak competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | -5.20% |
| Profit margin | -97.56% |
| Debt to equity | 515.06 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 5 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 70.0% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 7.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 1.5% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Satellite TV dreams collide with brutal losses
Picture your monthly TV bill funding a global satellite network that still cannot turn a profit. EchoStar delivers pay TV across the Americas and beyond yet posts revenue shrinking five percent, margins at minus ninety eight percent and return on equity of minus one hundred twelve percent.
We pass. The forward price to earnings sits at minus nine hundred eleven times, the moat is weak and the ethical screen flags excessive debt. Analyst targets may sit above the current price but none of that offsets the fundamental picture.
High leverage and persistent losses leave little room for error if competition or currency moves intensify. The business model depends on capital heavy infrastructure that shows no sign of paying off.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | -911.5x |
| Revenue growth | -5.2% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | -97.6% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -112.3% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 5.15 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 0.30 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.96 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $30.1B |
| Employees | 12,100 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on SATS
- › EchoStar Unit Files Chapter 11 With Backing From Over 88% of Noteholders GuruFocus.com · 28d ago
- › Q4 Earnings Highlights: EchoStar (NASDAQ:ECHO) Vs The Rest Of The Media & Entertainment Stocks StockStory · 28d ago
- › Satellite Pay-TV Provider Dish DBS Prepares for Bankruptcy Filing The Wall Street Journal · 29d ago
- › Q4 Earnings Highs And Lows: EchoStar (NASDAQ:ECHO) Vs The Rest Of The Media & Entertainment Stocks StockStory · 29d ago
- › EchoStar (ECHO) Names Jeffrey Blum Acting Chief Legal Officer After Dean Manson Exit Simply Wall St. · 28 Jun 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in SATS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
SATS trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | WADE WILLIAM DAVID | Director | 5,000 | $122,450 | |
| 2026-03-06 | AKHAVAN HAMID | Officer and Director | 71,005 | $7,634,458 | |
| 2026-03-06 | AKHAVAN HAMID | Officer and Director | 254,335 | $4,162,676 | |
| 2026-03-05 | MANSON DEAN A | Officer | 19,031 | $2,180,266 | |
| 2026-03-05 | MANSON DEAN A | Officer | 21,631 | $303,699 | |
| 2026-03-04 | SWIERINGA JOHN W | Chief Operating Officer | 50,088 | $5,689,228 | |
| 2026-03-04 | SWIERINGA JOHN W | Chief Operating Officer | 35,088 | $581,408 | |
| 2025-12-31 | ERGEN CANTEY | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 1,754 | $161,666 | |
| 2025-12-31 | ABERNATHY KATHLEEN Q | Director | 1,754 | $161,666 | |
| 2025-12-31 | AKHAVAN HAMID | Officer and Director | 263,158 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $129.14 | -10.8% | · | $892 | -10.8% |
| 2 months | $128.59 | -10.4% | · | $896 | -10.4% |
| 3 months | $107.71 | +7.0% | · | $1,070 | +7.0% |
| 6 months | $104.39 | +10.4% | · | $1,104 | +10.4% |
| 1 year | $16.74 | +588.4% | · | $6,884 | +588.4% |
| 2 years | $17.83 | +546.3% | · | $6,463 | +546.3% |
| 3 years | $17.02 | +577.1% | · | $6,771 | +577.1% |
| 5 years | $27.01 | +326.7% | · | $4,267 | +326.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.