The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 18% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 19%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $95.
Oneok OKE
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · ONEOK, Inc.
read at $89.46
Oneok holds its Markup at $89.46.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 14 days |
| Price | $89.46 |
| Valuation | 15.95 trailing · 14.43 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.71 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $73.70 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 19.60% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 19.60% |
| Profit margin | 10.03% |
| Debt to equity | 149.64 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 21 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 49.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 4.3% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 4.6% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Midstream cash flows hide a heavy debt burden
Every day gas moves through Oneok's network and the fees keep coming in. Yet the company trades well above our fair value with a negative margin of safety and a forward multiple that does not reflect the cyclical nature of energy volumes.
We pass because the ethical screen flags excessive debt and the business sits in a sector prone to boom and bust earnings. Revenue growth of twenty percent looks strong on the surface, yet profit margins of ten percent and a sixteen percent return on equity do not justify stretching valuations when downturns can erase those gains quickly.
Analysts may cluster around a higher target, but peak cycle earnings often produce low multiples that later prove expensive. Debt remains the core concern and leaves little room if volumes or prices turn. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.4x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 15.9x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 19.6% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 10.0% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 15.9% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.50 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.71 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.71 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $56.4B |
| Employees | 6,326 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on OKE
- › Apple upgraded, Brinker initiated: Wall Street's top analyst calls The Fly · 15d ago
- › Will Oneok (OKE) Beat Estimates Again in Its Next Earnings Report? Zacks · 16d ago
- › Is ONEOK (OKE) One of the Top Wonderful Stocks to Buy Now? Insider Monkey · 17d ago
- › BKV vs. California Resources: Which U.S. Oil and Gas Producer Stock Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026? Motley Fool · 18d ago
- › Oneok Has Delivered More Than 30 Years of Dividend Stability and Growth. With a 4.7% Yield, Is It the Best Income Stock in the Sector to Buy Right Now? Motley Fool · 18d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in OKE's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
OKE trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-20 | HULSE WALTER S III | Chief Financial Officer | 7,739 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | BURDICK KEVIN L | Officer | 5,628 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | SWORDS SHERIDAN C | Officer | 4,924 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | SPEARS MARY M. | Officer | 2,285 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | NORTON PIERCE H II | Chief Executive Officer | 17,588 | · | |
| 2026-02-20 | TAYLOR LYNDON C | Officer | 8,538 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | LENTZ RANDY N. | Chief Operating Officer | 6,556 | · | |
| 2026-01-23 | OWODUNNI PRECIOUS WILLIAMS | Director | 727 | $56,706 | |
| 2026-01-23 | MCCOLLUM MARK A | Director | 727 | $56,706 | |
| 2025-11-03 | DERKSEN BRIAN LLOYD | Director | 2,500 | $165,000 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-15 | Richard Blumenthal | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 15 Apr2026 | Richard Blumenthal | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 15 Apr2026 | Richard Blumenthal | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $87.79 | +3.8% | · | $1,038 | +3.8% |
| 2 months | $85.19 | +7.0% | $1.07 | $1,082 | +8.2% |
| 3 months | $83.92 | +8.6% | $1.07 | $1,098 | +9.8% |
| 6 months | $71.77 | +27.0% | $2.14 | $1,299 | +29.9% |
| 1 year | $77.45 | +17.6% | $4.20 | $1,231 | +23.1% |
| 2 years | $72.48 | +25.7% | $8.24 | $1,371 | +37.1% |
| 3 years | $51.28 | +77.7% | $12.13 | $2,013 | +101.3% |
| 5 years | $41.78 | +118.1% | $19.65 | $2,651 | +165.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.