The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
3M MMM
Clears the common standardAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · 3M Company provides diversified technology services in the America, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally.
read at $159.84
3M holds its Markup at $159.84.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 258 days |
| Price | $159.84 |
| Valuation | 30.80 trailing · 16.85 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.08 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 14% discount to our $182.39 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 1.30% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 1.30% |
| Profit margin | 11.14% |
| Debt to equity | 396.50 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 17 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 33.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 15.7%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.8% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 23.2% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.9% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
3M's Everyday Brands Mask Heavy Debt
Walk through any workshop or hospital and you will spot 3M products holding things together. The business still earns a solid 11 percent profit margin and posts a striking 71 percent ROE, yet revenue is barely growing at 1 percent a year.
We pass on the name because it fails our ethical screen on debt levels. A forward multiple of 16.8 times and a moderate moat do not offset that red flag, even with a modest gap to our fair value estimate.
The high return on equity looks impressive until you factor in the leverage behind it, and any slowdown in industrial spending could expose the thin growth rate quickly. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 16.8x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 30.8x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 1.3% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 11.1% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 71.5% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 3.96 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.59 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 1.08 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $83.4B |
| Employees | 60,500 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on MMM
- › Should 3M’s (MMM) Azure AI Optics Partnership With Microsoft Prompt a Rethink for Investors? Simply Wall St. · 10d ago
- › 3M Gears Up to Report Q2 Earnings: What Lies Ahead for the Stock? Zacks · 10d ago
- › Apple upgraded, Brinker initiated: Wall Street's top analyst calls The Fly · 10d ago
- › JPMorgan upgrades 3M, Emerson Electric to Overweight ahead of earnings Investing.com · 10d ago
- › Here Are Friday’s Top Wall Street Analyst Research Calls: Apple, Brinker International, Dutch Bros, Emerson Electric, Fervo Energy, Moody’s, Netflix, Oneok, 3M Company, and More 24/7 Wall St. · 10d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in MMM's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
MMM trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 4.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (17 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | BROWN THOMAS K | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | CHOI AUDREY | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | CHOW ANNE H | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | KEREERE SUZAN | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | BOZEMAN DAVID P | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | MITCHILL NEIL G JR | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | PIZARRO PEDRO J | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | SWEET THOMAS W. CPA | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-12 | FITTERLING JAMES R | Director | 1,360 | $195,000 | |
| 2026-05-01 | BROWN WILLIAM M. | Chief Executive Officer | 8,578 | $1,222,365 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-28 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 1 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $142.60 | +10.0% | $0.78 | $1,106 | +10.6% |
| 2 months | $149.55 | +4.9% | $0.78 | $1,054 | +5.4% |
| 3 months | $148.33 | +5.8% | $0.78 | $1,063 | +6.3% |
| 6 months | $166.98 | -6.0% | $1.56 | $949 | -5.1% |
| 1 year | $142.40 | +10.2% | $3.02 | $1,123 | +12.3% |
| 2 years | $96.81 | +62.1% | $5.88 | $1,682 | +68.2% |
| 3 years | $76.12 | +106.1% | $10.35 | $2,197 | +119.7% |
| 5 years | $141.87 | +10.6% | $20.32 | $1,249 | +24.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.