The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 2.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247.
Honeywell
HON · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $67.4B · 101,000 employees
Honeywell International Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-25 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 10 days ago
Screened 2026-09-25 · the tape above runs as of 09:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 212.55 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 187.21, over the last year.
- Trend Accumulation
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political selling, disclosed 2026-08-31
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its accumulation label.
Honeywell holds its Accumulation at $212.55. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 145 days.
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 145 days |
| Price at the screen | $212.55 |
| Valuation | 8.17 trailing · 21.39 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.90 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 48.27% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 48.3% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 1.91% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.9% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 27.29% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 27.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.99% | Below 5% | Only 1.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Honeywell's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 48% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
The Conscience OverlayThe quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Documented on Don’t Buy Into Occupation / Palestinian BDS National Committee — category: Corporate Complicity Report / Annex 2 Company List. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades above our $187.21 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 4.30% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-25 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 11.9% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 23 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +25% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-25 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsHoneywell trades rich while ethics flag red
Picture a steady industrial giant with fingers in aerospace and automation. Honeywell still prints decent returns on equity yet the shares sit well above any reasonable value. We pass because the price leaves no margin and the ethical screen already blocks the name.
Forward earnings sit on a 23 times multiple while revenue edges ahead just 2 percent a year. Profit margins hold at 11 percent and return on equity reaches 24 percent, yet our fair value lands 22 percent below the current quote. A moderate moat cannot justify paying up when growth stays this muted.
The debt ratio trips the ethical screen outright, and any cyclical slowdown would expose how little growth the business actually carries. Sixteen analysts may still push a buy with targets near 254 dollars, but the gap between price and value plus the leverage issue keep us away. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 21.4xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 8.2xvery cheap relative to earnings |
| EPS, trailing | 26.01 |
| EPS, forward | 9.94 |
| Revenue growth | +4.3%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 21.6%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 46.6%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 3.87% |
| Dividend yield | 223.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.85a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.21adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.90steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.02% |
| 52-week range | 195.87 - 260.28 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $67.4B |
| Employees | 101,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeHON trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 3.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 5.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (25 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $247. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- 3M vs. Honeywell: Which Industrial Conglomerate is a Stronger Pick? Zacks · 10d ago
- What Could Go Wrong With Eaton Stock? Trefis · 10d ago
- Is GE Aerospace's Lead Already In Its Stock Price? Trefis · 11d ago
- Caterpillar vs. Honeywell International: Which Industrials Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026? Motley Fool · 11d ago
- Is Honeywell International (HON) a Buy as Wall Street Analysts Look Optimistic? Zacks · 11d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-24 | HAMMOUD BILLAL | Officer | 471 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | LIEBLEIN GRACE D | Director | 625 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | WILLIAMSON STEPHEN | Director | 625 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | LAMACH MICHAEL W | Director | 625 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | DAVIS D. SCOTT | Director | 625 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | ANGOVE DUNCAN B | Director | 625 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | ARNOLD CRAIG | Director | 359 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | WATSON ROBIN | Director | 625 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | STEINBERG MARC | Director | 605 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | FLINT DEBORAH | Director | 625 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-31 | Kevin Hern | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $217.91 | -5.3% | $1.19 | $952 | -4.8% |
| 2 months | $233.76 | -11.8% | $1.19 | $888 | -11.2% |
| 3 months | $232.12 | -11.1% | $1.19 | $894 | -10.6% |
| 6 months | $191.84 | +7.5% | $2.38 | $1,088 | +8.8% |
| 1 year | $208.70 | -1.2% | $4.64 | $1,011 | +1.1% |
| 2 years | $190.38 | +8.4% | $8.85 | $1,130 | +13.0% |
| 3 years | $174.86 | +18.0% | $12.87 | $1,253 | +25.3% |
| 5 years | $191.32 | +7.8% | $20.36 | $1,185 | +18.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever HON does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.