The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 4.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 38%. The street (5 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $51.
Miami International Holdings, Inc. MIAX
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Miami International Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates various markets across options, futures, and cash equities.
read at $45.34
Miami International Holdings, Inc. holds its Distribution at $45.34.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 195 days |
| Price | $45.34 |
| Valuation | 35.15 trailing · 24.33 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | N/A |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 13.00% |
| Profit margin | 8.65% |
| Debt to equity | 2.13 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 5 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Exchange operator trips our ethical red line
Every options contract cleared through those Miami venues funnels cash across the same financial services maze that our screen flags outright. Miami International Holdings fails the ethical test on prohibited sector grounds, so we pass regardless of the reported 13% revenue growth or 17% ROE. The business itself may run steady markets, yet the sector exclusion is non-negotiable.
Numbers reinforce the decision. Shares sit at $42.33 against a $40.03 fair value, a negative margin of safety, while the 22.6x forward multiple prices in optimism the 9% profit margin does not fully support. Analyst chatter of a $52 target changes nothing once ethics close the door.
Sector cyclicality adds the usual trap risk of peak earnings inflating multiples that later compress, yet here the ethical block arrives first. Currency or regulatory swings in capital markets could still bite hard if volumes slow. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 24.3x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 35.1x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 13.0% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 8.6% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 16.8% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 2.13 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 2.77 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Market cap | $4.4B |
| Employees | 439 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in MIAX's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
MIAX trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 38%. The street (5 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $51.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $52.19 | -22.1% | · | $779 | -22.1% |
| 2 months | $41.95 | -3.1% | · | $969 | -3.1% |
| 3 months | $38.09 | +6.7% | · | $1,067 | +6.7% |
| 6 months | $41.78 | -2.7% | · | $973 | -2.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.