Framework Journal · one stock, one dated entry

Recorded 2026-07-27 · Permanent

An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.

In plain words · The Kroger Co.

The label
Distribution

read at $57.98

Kroger holds its Distribution at $57.98.

PHINPOOPSC
  • PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
  • INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
  • POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
  • OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
  • SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
  • edge confirmed
  • edge broken
  • edge forming

Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.

The investor read · the season, not the day

As held on the ledger · 2026-07-27
PhaseDistribution · caution
Quantitative stateThe statistical read favours the sellers, held for 232 days
Price$57.98
Valuation33.91 trailing · 10.46 forward price to earnings
Values screenFAIL · score 10.0
Beta0.44

The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth

Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 48% discount to our $86.00 fair value, weak competitive moat, 2.20% revenue growth.

Read at
$57.98
33.91 P/E · 10.46 fwd
Our fair value
$86.00
48% discount
Analyst target (avg)
$71.50
+23% to current
Target low $58.00Analyst target rangeTarget high $86.00
▲ current $57.98 · | average target

Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going

$90.1$60.4$30.7TODAY5y agoPROJECTIONOur fair value$86.00 +33%Analyst high$86.00 +33%Conservative$83.11 +29%Analyst avg$71.50 +11%

The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street

Current
$57.98
you are here
Conservative
$83.11
+43%
Analyst avg
$71.50
+23%
Our fair value
$86.00
+48%
Analyst high
$86.00
+48%

Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.

Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.

Revenue growth2.20%
Profit margin0.71%
Debt to equity373.45
Analyst consensusBuy · 22 covering

Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.

The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English

This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:

The common standard · AAOIFI
Used by most halal investing apps
✗ DOES NOT PASS
Our stricter standard · asset-based
The one Titan applies
✗ DOES NOT PASS

Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.

What these two standards are, and how they differ →

  • Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
  • Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 49.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
  • Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 2.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
  • Receivables Money owed to the company is 11.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
  • Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass

Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.

The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean

Common supermarket name we choose to avoid

Walk into any American supermarket and Kroger products sit on the shelves. Yet we pass on the name. The low forward multiple and apparent margin of safety do not outweigh the ethical red flag on debt levels.

Revenue edges up just 2 percent while net margins sit at 1 percent and the moat is rated weak. Return on equity reaches 14 percent but that is not enough to offset the debt screen failure. Analysts may cluster around a buy call with a $72 median target, yet our verdict stays clear.

High leverage creates real vulnerability when interest rates stay elevated or consumer spending slows. The ethical screen exists for moments like this. Analysis, not advice.

The fundamentals · plain-English read
Forward P/E10.5x
expensive even after accounting for its growth
Trailing P/E33.9x
a premium valuation
Revenue growth2.2%
slow but positive growth
Profit margin0.7%
barely profitable
Return on equity13.8%
a solid return on shareholder capital
Debt to equity3.73
heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens
Current ratio0.79
below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets
Beta0.44
barely tracks the market's swings
Market cap$35.5B
Employees403,000

The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.

Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.

Latest news · what the market is reading on KR

Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.

Related securities · others in KR's space worth a look

Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.

Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are

KR trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.

The trader read · the latest dated commentary

The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $76. Entered 2026-07-18 · Markup

The dated journal · newest first, never edited

2026-07-18 Markup $63.57 +0.0% Entry 3

The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (22 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $76.

2026-07-03 Markup $63.57 +0.0% Entry 2

The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.

2026-07-02 Markup $63.57 Entry 1

The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.

Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.

The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed

Most recent filings · KR
DateInsiderTitleTypeSharesValue
2026-03-12 JABBAR VALERIE L Officer 13,140 ·
2026-03-12 NICHOLS BRIAN W Officer 5,558 ·
2026-03-12 KENNERLEY DAVID JOHN CHRISTOPHER Chief Financial Officer 18,386 ·
2026-03-12 KELLEY JOSEPH MICHAEL Officer 9,345 ·
2026-03-12 SHAFFER MEGAN N Officer 4,159 ·
2026-03-12 VINCENT GEORGE H. Officer 8,455 ·
2026-03-12 FIKE CARIN L Officer and Treasurer 3,194 ·
2026-03-12 ARREAGA GABRIEL Officer 6,504 ·
2026-03-12 ADCOCK MARY ELLEN Officer 29,481 ·
2026-03-12 COSSET YAEL Officer 36,961 ·

Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.

The political ledger · congressional disclosures

Disclosures naming KR
DatePoliticianPartyTypeAmount
5 Jun2026 David Taylor Republican buy 1K–15K
27 May2026 Ro Khanna Democrat buy 1K–15K
22 Jun2026 Ann Wagner Republican buy 250K–500K
21 May2026 Gary Peters Democrat buy 1K–15K
2026-04-24 Ro Khanna Democrat Purchase 1K–15K

What holding actually paid · price plus dividends

If $1,000 had been placed · historical, not a promise
PeriodPrice thenPrice returnDivs per share$1,000 becameTotal return
1 month $64.46 +0.3% $0.35 $1,008 +0.8%
2 months $67.63 -4.4% $0.35 $961 -3.9%
3 months $74.57 -13.3% $0.35 $871 -12.9%
6 months $61.58 +5.0% $0.70 $1,061 +6.1%
1 year $64.09 +0.8% $1.40 $1,030 +3.0%
2 years $49.52 +30.5% $2.68 $1,359 +35.9%
3 years $43.22 +49.5% $3.84 $1,584 +58.4%
5 years $34.80 +85.7% $5.72 $2,022 +102.2%

Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever KR does next, these words stay.

Kroger · KR · Distribution · $57.98
Recorded 2026-07-27 · before the outcome · scored mechanically

Get our weekly market brief free.