The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (8 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $25.
Hormel Foods HRL
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Hormel Foods Corporation develops, processes, and distributes various meat, nuts, and other food products to foodservice, convenience store, and commercial customers in the United States and internationally.
read at $25.37
Hormel Foods holds its Markup at $25.37.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 142 days |
| Price | $25.37 |
| Valuation | 29.85 trailing · 16.27 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 87.2 |
| Beta | 0.33 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads OPPORTUNITY — it trades at roughly a 15% discount to our $29.09 fair value, weak competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | -2.90% |
| Profit margin | 3.82% |
| Debt to equity | 4.24 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 8 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 21.3% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 4.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 10.9% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Steady meats priced below their worth
Picture the same tins and packs landing in trolleys every week, the sort of defensive names that keep shelves full even when wallets tighten. Hormel sits at $25.39 against our $29.10 fair value, a 15 percent margin of safety on a forward multiple of 16.3 times. Revenue may be down 3 percent, yet the shares still clear our ethical screen and the business keeps turning a 4 percent profit margin.
The case rests on that valuation gap rather than any sudden growth spurt. A hold rating from eight analysts lines up with a $27 median target, so the market is not pricing in heroics. The shares simply look cheaper than the steady cash flows the defensive category can deliver in tougher times.
Risks are plain. A weak moat and 6 percent return on equity leave little room for error if volumes keep slipping or input costs spike. Packaged foods rarely collapse, yet they also rarely surprise to the upside when competition is this crowded. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 16.3x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 29.8x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | -2.9% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 3.8% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 5.8% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 4.24 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.94 healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.33 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $14.0B |
| Employees | 20,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in HRL's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
HRL trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | WHITE STEVEN ANDREW | Director | 2,665 | $60,375 | |
| 2026-03-31 | BHOJWANI GARY C. | Director | 2,665 | $60,375 | |
| 2026-03-31 | NEWLANDS WILLIAM A | Chairman of the Board | 6,721 | $152,250 | |
| 2026-03-31 | POLICINSKI CHRISTOPHER J | Director | 2,491 | $56,437 | |
| 2026-03-31 | SCHONEMAN DEBBRA L.EE | Director | 1,332 | $30,187 | |
| 2026-03-18 | WHITE STEVEN ANDREW | Director | 5,405 | · | |
| 2026-02-02 | GHINGO JOHN F | President | 32,707 | · | |
| 2026-02-02 | AAKRE SCOTT D | Director | 6,541 | · | |
| 2026-02-02 | WHITE STEVEN ANDREW | Director | 6,541 | · | |
| 2026-02-02 | ZECHMEISTER MICHAEL PAUL | Director | 6,541 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $20.16 | +20.6% | · | $1,206 | +20.6% |
| 2 months | $20.58 | +18.2% | $0.29 | $1,196 | +19.6% |
| 3 months | $22.38 | +8.6% | $0.29 | $1,099 | +9.9% |
| 6 months | $23.08 | +5.3% | $0.59 | $1,079 | +7.9% |
| 1 year | $29.67 | -18.0% | $1.17 | $859 | -14.1% |
| 2 years | $28.05 | -13.3% | $2.31 | $949 | -5.1% |
| 3 years | $36.29 | -33.0% | $3.43 | $764 | -23.6% |
| 5 years | $41.41 | -41.3% | $5.51 | $720 | -28.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.