The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Home Depot (The)
HD · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $333.5B · 472,400 employees
The Home Depot, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-08-20
Screened 2026-08-20 · the tape above runs as of 23:26 UTC · 4 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markdown label.
Home Depot (The) holds its Markdown at $334.49. Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 3 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 3 days |
| Price at the screen | $334.49 |
| Valuation | 23.41 trailing · 20.84 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.96 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 62.18% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 62.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 6.11% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 6.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.08% | Below 5% | Only 0.1% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades above our $322.89 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 5.70% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-08-20 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 3.5% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 32 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +13% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-08-20 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsHome Improvement Giant Struggles with Debt
Imagine you're about to renovate your home. You walk into Home Depot, aisles filled with tools and materials for every project. But behind the scenes, the company is carrying a heavy debt load that's weighing it down. With a debt ratio that fails our ethical screen, Home Depot is struggling to keep afloat financially, a stark contrast to the robust selection of items it offers.
Why it stands out, or rather, why we're passing, is multifaceted. Despite a forward P/E of 21, which suggests reasonable valuation, the stock's price sits above our fair value estimate of $322.89 by a slim 4%, indicating a lack of margin of safety. Coupled with a 6% revenue growth and an ROE of 104%, the numbers might seem compelling, but the debt issue is a glaring red flag.
Risk factors are significant, primarily due to the company's narrow moat and the ethical failing on debt ratio. The market consensus is bullish, with a median target of $379, but with a debt-ridden balance sheet, the potential for instability is high. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 20.8xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 23.4xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 14.29 |
| EPS, forward | 16.05 |
| Revenue growth | +5.7%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 8.4%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 104.3%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 3.36% |
| Dividend yield | 294.00% |
| Debt to equity | 3.77heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.08adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.96steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.01% |
| 52-week range | 289.10 - 426.75 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $333.5B |
| Employees | 472,400 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeHD trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 6.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 7.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (33 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $372.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Why Cheap LOW Stock Fails Part Of The Value Test Trefis · 9h ago
- Uneven Investor Sentiment Toward Hardline Retailers Could Persist Amid Macro Headwinds, UBS Says MT Newswires · 12h ago
- Costco Stock Is Priced For Two Good Years, Is That A Safe Bet? Trefis · 1d ago
- The "Untouchable" List: Stocks That Short Sellers Won't Dare Bet Against GuruFocus.com · 1d ago
- Mortgage Rates Just Hit a 1-Year High. Here’s What That Means for Lowe’s and Home Depot Investors. Motley Fool · 1d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | McPhail Richard V | EVP, CFO | Sale | 2,550 | $940,670 |
| 2026-03-04 | Deaton John A. | EVP - Supply Chain, Prod. Dev | Sale | 1,793 | $661,617 |
| 2025-12-26 | Roseborough Teresa Wynn | EVP, Gen. Counsel, Corp. Sec. | Sale | 2,872 | $1,000,961 |
| 2025-12-12 | Brown Angie | EVP, CIO | Sale | 1,946 | $695,948 |
| 2025-12-11 | Campbell Ann Marie | Senior EVP | Sale | 145 | $51,948 |
| 2025-09-12 | Bastek William D | EVP, Merchandising | Sale | 2,303 | $974,445 |
| 2025-08-22 | Roseborough Teresa Wynn | EVP, Gen. Counsel, Corp. Sec. | Sale | 5,483 | $2,265,767 |
| 2025-08-22 | Bastek William D | EVP, Merchandising | Sale | 3,783 | $1,551,900 |
| 2025-08-20 | McPhail Richard V | EVP, CFO | Sale | 3,369 | $1,359,931 |
| 2025-08-20 | Padilla Hector A | EVP - US Sales, Operations | Sale | 1,585 | $640,609 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 30 Jul2026 | Rich McCormick | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-05-15 | David Taylor | Republican | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-09 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | Sale | 15K–50K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $309.08 | +3.5% | $2.33 | $1,043 | +4.3% |
| 2 months | $334.83 | -4.5% | $2.33 | $962 | -3.8% |
| 3 months | $336.41 | -4.9% | $4.66 | $965 | -3.5% |
| 6 months | $352.44 | -9.2% | $4.66 | $921 | -7.9% |
| 1 year | $358.38 | -10.7% | $9.26 | $919 | -8.1% |
| 2 years | $316.32 | +1.1% | $18.36 | $1,069 | +6.9% |
| 3 years | $275.58 | +16.1% | $27.04 | $1,259 | +25.9% |
| 5 years | $274.40 | +16.6% | $42.12 | $1,319 | +31.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever HD does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.