The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
GitLab Inc.
GTLB · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $7.8B · 2,580 employees
GitLab Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops software for the software development lifecycle in the United States, Europe, and the Asia Pacific.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-11
Screened 2026-09-11 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markup label.
GitLab Inc. holds its Markup at $46.99. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 11 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 11 days |
| Price at the screen | $46.99 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 45.25 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.99 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Interest-bearing securities
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 0.01% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 0.0% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 59.81% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing cash and securities are 59.8% of assets, above the one-third limit. | Fail |
| Receivables | 30.99% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 31.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 4.78% | Below 5% | Only 4.8% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-11 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 16.2% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 23 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +17% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-11 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsGitLab Platform Wins Fans But Not Value
Picture a single workbench where coders, security teams and ops staff all reach for the same tools without switching tabs. GitLab built that workbench, and revenue keeps rising at 23 percent a year. Yet the shares sit 13 percent above our fair value, carry a forward multiple of 31.8 times, and still lose money on a negative 2 percent margin. We pass.
The market already prices in perfection, with twenty-three analysts clustered around a hold rating and a $32 target that matches the current price. Negative return on equity and an unknown moat leave little room for disappointment. Ethical screens are cleared, but that alone does not justify stretching for growth at any price.
Valuation risk sits front and centre. If growth slows or losses persist, the premium can compress quickly. Currency moves and competition from larger cloud suites add further pressure on margins that have yet to turn positive. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 45.3xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| EPS, trailing | -0.32 |
| EPS, forward | 1.04 |
| Revenue growth | +21.3%strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | -5.0%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -5.7%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 3.65% |
| Current ratio | 2.41comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.99steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.10% |
| 52-week range | 18.73 - 55.55 |
| Market cap | $7.8B |
| Employees | 2,580 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeGTLB trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 6.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markup to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 19.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 17.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30. Insiders have been net buyers over the past quarter.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $30.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | Staples William | CEO | Purchase | 4,188 | $1 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $25.64 | +10.7% | · | $1,107 | +10.7% |
| 2 months | $19.42 | +46.1% | · | $1,461 | +46.1% |
| 3 months | $22.82 | +24.3% | · | $1,243 | +24.3% |
| 6 months | $40.70 | -30.3% | · | $697 | -30.3% |
| 1 year | $48.51 | -41.5% | · | $585 | -41.5% |
| 2 years | $44.27 | -35.9% | · | $641 | -35.9% |
| 3 years | $47.18 | -39.9% | · | $601 | -39.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever GTLB does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.