The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 19% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (9 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $60.
Golar LNG Limited GLNG
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $49.65
Golar LNG Limited holds its Markdown at $49.65.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markdown label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 2 days |
| Price | $49.65 |
| Valuation | 38.49 trailing · 46.26 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 0.01 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $36.53 fair value estimate, weak competitive moat, 120.10% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 120.10% |
| Profit margin | 30.10% |
| Debt to equity | 127.19 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 9 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 47.8% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 20.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
LNG booms often mask the debt trap
Imagine a gas tanker riding a sudden wave of demand only to hit a debt wall when prices turn. Golar LNG finds itself in that position, with revenue up 120% yet trading at a 46 times forward multiple well above our fair value of $36.53 against the current $49.65 price.
We pass because the 30% profit margin and 9% ROE sit alongside a weak moat and an ethical screen failure on debt levels. Cyclical energy names often flash high growth right at peak earnings, turning what looks like momentum into a classic value trap rather than a durable opportunity.
Analyst targets may point higher, yet the combination of elevated valuation, thin returns and leverage creates real downside when the cycle shifts. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 46.3x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 38.5x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 120.1% growing very fast |
| Profit margin | 30.1% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 8.9% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.27 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.57 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.01 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $5.1B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in GLNG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
GLNG trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $56.53 | -9.6% | $0.25 | $908 | -9.2% |
| 2 months | $53.01 | -3.6% | $0.25 | $968 | -3.2% |
| 3 months | $44.56 | +14.6% | $0.25 | $1,152 | +15.2% |
| 6 months | $36.66 | +39.4% | $0.50 | $1,407 | +40.7% |
| 1 year | $40.79 | +25.3% | $1.00 | $1,277 | +27.7% |
| 2 years | $26.36 | +93.8% | $2.25 | $2,024 | +102.4% |
| 3 years | $20.21 | +152.8% | $3.00 | $2,676 | +167.6% |
| 5 years | $11.96 | +327.0% | $3.25 | $4,542 | +354.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.