The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 20.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 30%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (1 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $5.
Bridgeline Digital, Inc.
BLIN · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $12M · 40 employees
Bridgeline Digital, Inc.
PASS · Titan Ethical · score 92.6At the last full screen
2026-09-07
Screened 2026-09-07 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markdown label.
Bridgeline Digital, Inc. holds its Markdown at $0.93. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 15 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 15 days |
| Price at the screen | $0.93 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 7.71 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 92.6 |
| Beta | 0.96 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Full pass across all five screens. This security clears the Titan Ethical Standard: its business and its balance sheet both stay inside the lines.
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 6.45% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 6.4% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 13.21% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 13.2% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads OPPORTUNITY: weak competitive moat, 2.00% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-07 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 0.0% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Where it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-07 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsTiny search tool firm offers slim value
Picture a small outfit selling site search add-ons to retailers that already have bigger platforms doing the same job. Bridgeline Digital clears the ethical screen and carries an opportunity label, yet it trades at $1.22 against a fair value of $0.89. Forward earnings sit at 10.2 times, revenue edges up just 1 percent, and the business still posts an 11 percent loss margin with negative 17 percent return on equity.
The weak competitive position stands out most. HawkSearch and Celebros give marketers basic personalisation, but nothing that larger rivals cannot match or bundle for free. Low multiples often flag companies that cannot grow profitably, and here the numbers line up with that pattern rather than any hidden bargain.
Risk sits in the thin growth, persistent losses and limited ability to defend pricing. Currency or sector swings could widen the gap to fair value quickly. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 7.7xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| EPS, trailing | -0.10 |
| EPS, forward | 0.12 |
| Revenue growth | +2.0%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | -8.6%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -14.2%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 3.50% |
| Debt to equity | 0.11minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.61below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.96steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.01% |
| 52-week range | 0.69 - 1.62 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $12M |
| Employees | 40 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeBLIN trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 15.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 30%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (1 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $5.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 30%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (1 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $5.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score (93). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score (93). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | KAHN ROGER E | Chief Executive Officer | 10,000 | $9,300 | |
| 2026-03-03 | KETSLAKH MICHAEL | Director | 6,959 | $5,915 | |
| 2026-02-25 | KETSLAKH MICHAEL | Director | 13,041 | $11,085 | |
| 2026-02-19 | KAHN ROGER E | Chief Executive Officer | 54,301 | $42,206 | |
| 2026-02-19 | KETSLAKH MICHAEL | Director | 1,353 | $1,150 | |
| 2026-01-30 | GALAZNIK KENNETH J | Director | 22,500 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | KAHN JONI | Director | 22,500 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | KAHN ROGER E | Chief Executive Officer | 300,000 | $246,000 | |
| 2026-01-30 | KETSLAKH MICHAEL | Director | 22,500 | · | |
| 2026-01-30 | ROSS BRANDON | Director | 22,500 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | sell | 250K–500K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $0.96 | +14.6% | · | $1,146 | +14.6% |
| 2 months | $0.85 | +29.4% | · | $1,294 | +29.4% |
| 3 months | $0.95 | +15.8% | · | $1,158 | +15.8% |
| 6 months | $1.06 | +3.8% | · | $1,038 | +3.8% |
| 1 year | $1.57 | -29.9% | · | $701 | -29.9% |
| 2 years | $1.07 | +2.8% | · | $1,028 | +2.8% |
| 3 years | $1.13 | -2.6% | · | $974 | -2.6% |
| 5 years | $2.71 | -59.4% | · | $406 | -59.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever BLIN does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.