The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities
ARE · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $7.0B · 514 employees
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 23 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 5 days ago
Screened 2026-10-23 · the tape above runs as of 18:04 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price43.02 USD at the 23 Oct 2026 close
- Our ratingAvoid, current read distribution
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans to puts (put/call 3.13)
- Last reviewed23 Oct 2026 (5 days ago)
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
What this means: price 43.02 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 52.50, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political buying, disclosed 2026-09-25
- Options put/call open interest 3.13, read 2026-10-23
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities holds its Distribution at $43.02. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 88 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 88 days |
| Price at the screen | $43.02 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · -50.16 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.18 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 37.44% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 37.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 4.49% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 4.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 1.63% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 1.6% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Alexandria Real Estate Equities's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 37% of the company, just over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-27. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when ARE's ethical verdict changes
Today ARE does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 29% discount to our $52.50 fair value, weak competitive moat.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-23 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 29.2% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 14 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +22% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-10-23 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsLife science landlord posts deepening losses
Picture a landlord whose lab buildings should be in demand yet still reports shrinking revenue and negative profits. We pass on this name because the core numbers point to a business losing ground fast in a sector that demands strength.
Forward earnings sit at a negative fifty seven times multiple with revenue down twelve percent and profit margins at negative thirty six percent. Return on equity has turned negative four percent while the ethical screen flags excessive debt and the moat looks weak.
Fourteen analysts sit on a hold rating with a median target only slightly above the current price yet the combination of leverage and negative returns leaves little room for error if rates stay high. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | -50.2x |
| EPS, trailing | -6.05 |
| EPS, forward | -0.81 |
| Revenue growth | -11.9%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | -36.1%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -4.1%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 19.24% |
| Dividend yield | 882.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.69moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 2.35comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.18moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.06% |
| 52-week range | 39.41 - 78.51 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $7.0B |
| Employees | 514 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeARE trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 4.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 7.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 6.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51.
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 9.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $51.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Alexandria's Q3 Earnings Preview: Is ARE Stock a Portfolio Must-Have? Yahoo Finance · 6d ago
- First Industrial Realty Trust (FR) Q3 FFO Miss Estimates Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Gear Up for Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) Q3 Earnings: Wall Street Estimates for Key Metrics Yahoo Finance · 7d ago
- Realty Income Stock And Other Rate Sensitive Dividend Picks For Steady Income Yahoo Finance · 12d ago
- Earnings Preview: What To Expect From Alexandria Real Estate's Report Yahoo Finance · 22d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | MARCUS JOEL S | Officer and Director | 7,500 | $347,558 | |
| 2026-05-05 | MARCUS JOEL S | Officer and Director | 7,500 | $320,416 | |
| 2026-05-04 | MARCUS JOEL S | Officer and Director | 10,000 | $410,200 | |
| 2026-04-17 | KUHN HALLIE E. | Officer | 536 | $25,835 | |
| 2026-04-15 | MCGRATH SHEILA K. | Director | 129 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | KLEIN RICHARD HUNTER | Director | 112 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | WORONOFF MICHAEL A | Director | 407 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | HASH STEVE | Director | 343 | · | |
| 2026-04-15 | CAIN JAMES P | Director | 145 | · | |
| 2026-03-31 | LEE ORRAPARN C. | Officer | 21,543 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-29 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-25 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-21 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $46.00 | +14.8% | · | $1,148 | +14.8% |
| 2 months | $42.61 | +23.9% | · | $1,239 | +23.9% |
| 3 months | $49.47 | +6.7% | $0.72 | $1,082 | +8.2% |
| 6 months | $44.21 | +19.4% | $1.44 | $1,227 | +22.7% |
| 1 year | $68.77 | -23.2% | $4.08 | $827 | -17.3% |
| 2 years | $101.67 | -48.1% | $9.32 | $611 | -38.9% |
| 3 years | $103.00 | -48.8% | $14.34 | $652 | -34.8% |
| 5 years | $155.94 | -66.2% | $23.66 | $490 | -51.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever ARE does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.