The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 8% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 31%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (5 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $47.
Trustmark Corporation TRMK
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Trustmark Corporation operates as the bank holding company for Trustmark National Bank that provides banking and other financial solutions to individuals and corporate institutions in the United States.
read at $48.49
Trustmark Corporation holds its Accumulation at $48.49.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $48.49 |
| Valuation | 12.34 trailing · 11.80 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.64 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
| Revenue growth | 10.50% |
| Profit margin | 28.72% |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 5 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: bank. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: bank Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Ethics draw a hard line on this regional bank
Picture a local branch where everyday deposits turn into loans for homes and small firms. Trustmark clears the basic numbers with 11.4 times forward earnings, 6 percent revenue growth, 28 percent profit margins and 11 percent return on equity, yet the ethical screen stops any further look because the business sits inside banking.
We pass for that single reason. The modest 11 percent margin of safety to our fair value sits beside a hold consensus from analysts at the current price, but sector rules override valuation math every time.
Risk sits in the usual bank exposures to interest rates and credit cycles, yet the ethical block comes first and removes any case for deeper work. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 11.8x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 12.3x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 10.5% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 28.7% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 11.1% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Beta | 0.64 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $2.8B |
| Employees | 2,530 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in TRMK's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
TRMK trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $43.85 | +3.1% | $0.25 | $1,037 | +3.7% |
| 2 months | $44.66 | +1.3% | $0.25 | $1,018 | +1.8% |
| 3 months | $40.93 | +10.5% | $0.25 | $1,111 | +11.1% |
| 6 months | $40.44 | +11.8% | $0.50 | $1,131 | +13.1% |
| 1 year | $34.56 | +30.8% | $0.98 | $1,337 | +33.7% |
| 2 years | $26.39 | +71.3% | $1.92 | $1,786 | +78.6% |
| 3 years | $21.15 | +113.8% | $2.84 | $2,272 | +127.2% |
| 5 years | $28.44 | +59.0% | $4.68 | $1,754 | +75.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.