The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 5%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (2 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $75.
U-Haul Holding Company UHAL
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $71.30
U-Haul Holding Company holds its Markup at $71.30.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 55 days |
| Price | $71.30 |
| Valuation | 297.08 trailing · 33.63 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 1.11 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 3.10% |
| Profit margin | 1.38% |
| Debt to equity | 106.74 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 3 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 82.3% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 10.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Debt burden sinks this household mover
Picture a family lugging boxes across town. The van belongs to U-Haul, yet the balance sheet carries more debt than the business can comfortably support. We pass. The ethical screen flags the debt ratio, and the rest of the numbers do nothing to change the view.
Forward earnings sit at 33.6 times while revenue grows just 3 percent, profit margins run at 1 percent and return on equity is also 1 percent. The moat is weak. Analysts may like the shares and eye a much higher price, yet the gap between the current price and our fair value already shows limited room for error.
High leverage in a cyclical rental market leaves little margin for an economic dip or rising interest costs. The ethical failure on debt simply rules it out. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 33.6x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 297.1x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 3.1% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 1.4% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 1.1% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.07 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.04 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.11 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $13.9B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in UHAL's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
UHAL trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $51.94 | +17.7% | · | $1,177 | +17.7% |
| 2 months | $51.21 | +19.4% | · | $1,194 | +19.4% |
| 3 months | $45.52 | +34.3% | · | $1,343 | +34.3% |
| 6 months | $54.56 | +12.0% | · | $1,120 | +12.0% |
| 1 year | $64.44 | -5.1% | · | $949 | -5.1% |
| 2 years | $63.29 | -3.4% | · | $966 | -3.4% |
| 3 years | $55.26 | +10.6% | · | $1,106 | +10.6% |
| 5 years | $55.22 | +10.7% | $0.25 | $1,111 | +11.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.