The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 4.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $106.
MetLife
MET · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $62.1B · 46,000 employees
MetLife, Inc., a financial services company, provides insurance, annuities, employee benefits, and asset management services worldwide.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-25 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 10 days ago
Screened 2026-09-25 · the tape above runs as of 09:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 97.70 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 119.00, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
MetLife holds its Markdown at $97.70. The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 34 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 34 days |
| Price at the screen | $97.70 |
| Valuation | 18.72 trailing · 8.95 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.76 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
MetLife does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 22% discount to our $119.00 fair value, weak competitive moat, 10.50% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-25 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 21.8% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 16 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +11% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-25 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsInsurance Premiums Meet an Ethical Wall
Every month families hand over premiums hoping for security when illness or loss hits. MetLife sits at the centre of that promise across the US, Asia and Latin America, yet it fails our ethical screen on business activity grounds. That single failure overrides the surface appeal of an 8.5 times forward earnings multiple and a modest 12 percent gap to our fair value estimate.
Revenue is creeping forward at just 3 percent, margins sit at 5 percent and return on equity reaches only 13 percent. The moat is rated weak. Sixteen analysts still lean buy with a 102 dollar median target, but we pass because the ethical breach is clear and the growth profile offers little compensation for it.
Valuation multiples can compress further if claims or investment returns disappoint, and the ethical flag removes any margin for error. The low multiple reflects limited growth rather than a bargain. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 8.9xfairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 18.7xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 5.22 |
| EPS, forward | 10.92 |
| Revenue growth | +10.5%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 4.6%barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 13.1%a solid return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | -33.75% |
| Dividend yield | 304.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.80a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.03comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.76steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.02% |
| 52-week range | 67.33 - 100.93 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $62.1B |
| Employees | 46,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeMET trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 1.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $105.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 12.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $92.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (16 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $92.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- The 30-Year Treasury Yield Just Hit a 19-Year High. Life Insurers Reinvest at Those Rates for Decades. Motley Fool · 15d ago
- MetLife (MET) Sees Record Annuity Demand, Is The Upside Already Priced In? Simply Wall St. · 16d ago
- 3 Life Insurers to Watch as Annuity Sales Hit First-Half Record Highs Zacks · 18d ago
- Can Lincoln National Turn Greater Capital Flexibility Into Growth? Zacks · 21d ago
- Higher Rates Are a Gift to These 3 Insurance Dividend Stocks 24/7 Wall St. · 22d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | O'NEILL ADRIENNE KAREN | Officer | 12,485 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | MUMENTHALER CHRISTIAN STEPHANE | Director | 721 | $51,314 | |
| 2026-04-01 | MCKENZIE DIANA L | Director | 721 | $51,314 | |
| 2026-04-01 | WEINBERGER MARK A | Director | 721 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | SEITZ MICHELLE | Director | 721 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | HAY LAURA J | Director | 721 | $51,314 | |
| 2026-04-01 | JOHNSON JEH CHARLES | Director | 721 | $51,314 | |
| 2026-04-01 | HARRIS CARLA A | Director | 721 | $51,314 | |
| 2026-04-01 | GLASER DANIEL S | Director | 721 | $51,314 | |
| 2026-04-01 | MORRISON DENISE M | Director | 721 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-09 | Kevin Hern | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-09 | Kevin Hern | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-26 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-26 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-26 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $77.39 | +11.9% | $0.59 | $1,127 | +12.7% |
| 2 months | $73.32 | +18.1% | $0.59 | $1,189 | +18.9% |
| 3 months | $68.27 | +26.9% | $0.59 | $1,277 | +27.7% |
| 6 months | $81.04 | +6.9% | $1.16 | $1,083 | +8.3% |
| 1 year | $77.11 | +12.3% | $2.30 | $1,153 | +15.3% |
| 2 years | $66.29 | +30.7% | $4.50 | $1,374 | +37.4% |
| 3 years | $49.19 | +76.1% | $6.61 | $1,895 | +89.5% |
| 5 years | $55.05 | +57.3% | $10.57 | $1,765 | +76.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever MET does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.