The framework has shifted from accumulation to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 1.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 7% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (15 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $119.
Aflac
AFL · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $57.0B · 12,716 employees
Aflac Incorporated, through its subsidiaries, provides supplemental health and life insurance products.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-25 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 10 days ago
Screened 2026-09-25 · the tape above runs as of 03:09 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 113.72 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 91.94, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders insiders sold, $1,363,541, latest filing 2026-09-28
- Positioning political selling, disclosed 2026-08-10
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Aflac holds its Markdown at $113.72. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 322 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 322 days |
| Price at the screen | $113.72 |
| Valuation | 12.27 trailing · 15.08 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.58 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Aflac does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in conventional financial services, which the screen treats as interest-based, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades above our $91.94 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-25 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 19.2% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 15 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +2% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-25 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsAflac Trips the Ethical Screen Despite Solid Numbers
Picture a policyholder in Osaka or Atlanta filing a cancer claim and the payout arrives on time. Aflac has built a decent franchise in supplemental health cover across Japan and the US, with revenue up 28 percent, a 26 percent profit margin and 16 percent ROE. The business carries a moderate moat and trades at 16.5 times forward earnings.
We pass because the stock fails our business activity screen outright. It also sits 8 percent above our fair value of 115 dollars at the current 124.72 dollars, with analysts clustered around a 117 dollar hold target. Strong cash generation does not offset the ethical red flag.
The main risk is that the ethical issue stays unresolved while the shares remain expensive relative to our calculation. Insurance can look steady until a regulatory or reputational shock hits the premium flow. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.1xreasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 12.3xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 9.27 |
| EPS, forward | 7.54 |
| Revenue growth | -1.0%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 26.9%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 16.9%a solid return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 9.04% |
| Dividend yield | 216.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.53moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 0.89below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.58steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.03% |
| 52-week range | 105.43 - 130.22 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $57.0B |
| Employees | 12,716 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeAFL trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 8.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 7% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (15 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $119.
The framework has shifted from accumulation to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 0.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 7% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $112.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 5.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 7% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $112.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 7% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $112.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 7% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (14 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $112.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Aflac’s (AFL) Net Earnings Jumped 37.7%, Yet Adjusted Earnings Actually Fell Insider Monkey · 16d ago
- GL Outperforms Industry, Trades at a Discount: How to Play the Stock Zacks · 17d ago
- Jim Cramer on Aflac (AFL): “Not Great, Not Bad” Insider Monkey · 18d ago
- How Is Aflac’s Stock Performance Compared to Other Insurance Stocks Barchart · 27d ago
- 3 of Wall Street’s Safest High-Yield Dividend Stocks With Over 25-Year Increase Streaks 24/7 Wall St. · 3 Sep 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 | Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. | 10% | S - Sale | 12,000 | $1,363,541 |
| 2026-09-25 | Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. | 10% | S - Sale | 12,100 | $1,374,068 |
| 2026-09-24 | Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. | 10% | S - Sale | 12,100 | $1,387,177 |
| 2026-09-23 | Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. | 10% | S - Sale | 13,500 | $1,555,239 |
| 2026-09-22 | Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. | 10% | S - Sale | 12,200 | $1,397,510 |
| 2026-09-16 | Koide Masatoshi | Pres, Rep. Dir, ALIJ | S - Sale+OE | 13,201 | $1,557,894 |
| 2026-05-19 | JAPAN POST HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 50,000 | $5,939,992 | |
| 2026-05-18 | JAPAN POST HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 41,700 | $4,939,291 | |
| 2026-05-15 | KENNY THOMAS J | Director | 1,740 | $202,832 | |
| 2026-05-15 | JAPAN POST HOLDINGS CO., LTD. | Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 23,500 | $2,745,886 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-10 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $114.89 | +2.0% | $0.61 | $1,025 | +2.5% |
| 2 months | $110.13 | +6.4% | $0.61 | $1,069 | +6.9% |
| 3 months | $109.07 | +7.4% | $0.61 | $1,080 | +8.0% |
| 6 months | $107.72 | +8.8% | $1.22 | $1,099 | +9.9% |
| 1 year | $100.13 | +17.0% | $2.38 | $1,194 | +19.4% |
| 2 years | $84.81 | +38.2% | $4.54 | $1,435 | +43.5% |
| 3 years | $64.67 | +81.2% | $6.38 | $1,910 | +91.0% |
| 5 years | $50.20 | +133.4% | $9.48 | $2,523 | +152.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever AFL does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.