The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 3.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 24%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%.
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. KYN
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
read at $14.29
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. holds its Markup at $14.29.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days |
| Price | $14.29 |
| Valuation | 4.93 trailing · 4.96 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.66 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
| Revenue growth | 17.90% |
| Profit margin | 475.17% |
| Debt to equity | 25.08 |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Energy fund hits ethical wall despite low multiple
Picture a closed end fund promising steady payouts from US energy pipes and grids. Kayne Anderson looks cheap on paper with a forward P/E of 5.1x, 8% revenue growth and a reported 387% profit margin. Yet we pass without hesitation because the business sits in financial services, which our ethical screen rejects outright. Opportunity rating sits at none for the same reason.
The valuation gap to fair value looks wide but that is irrelevant once the sector flag appears. Profit margins this elevated often reflect accounting quirks in funds rather than durable operating strength, and ROE of 15% does not change the core issue. This is exactly what the screen is for.
Energy infrastructure carries its own cyclical swings in commodity prices and interest rates that can compress distributions quickly. We simply do not engage when the ethical line is crossed. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 5.0x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 4.9x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | 17.9% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 475.2% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 19.7% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.25 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.03 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.66 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $2.4B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in KYN's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
KYN trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 24%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $13.75 | +2.6% | $0.09 | $1,032 | +3.2% |
| 2 months | $13.68 | +3.1% | $0.17 | $1,044 | +4.4% |
| 3 months | $13.95 | +1.1% | $0.26 | $1,029 | +2.9% |
| 6 months | $11.62 | +21.4% | $0.51 | $1,258 | +25.8% |
| 1 year | $11.36 | +24.2% | $0.99 | $1,329 | +32.9% |
| 2 years | $8.63 | +63.5% | $2.01 | $1,867 | +86.7% |
| 3 years | $6.28 | +124.7% | $2.87 | $2,703 | +170.3% |
| 5 years | $5.79 | +143.8% | $4.40 | $3,199 | +219.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.