The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 0% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 32%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (1 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $16.
International Money Express, Inc. IMXI
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · International Money Express, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an omnichannel money remittance services company in the United States, Latin America, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, Afric…
read at $14.95
International Money Express, Inc. holds its Distribution at $14.95.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 178 days |
| Price | $14.95 |
| Valuation | 18.70 trailing · 8.54 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.78 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 7% discount to our $16.00 fair value, moderate competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | -14.90% |
| Profit margin | 4.31% |
| Debt to equity | 1.61 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 1 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 57.5% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are 37.4% of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Why it gives us pause
At 8.5x forward earnings, the price already runs ahead of the business. Our fair value sits at $16.00, below where it trades today. The moderate moat is real, but quality alone does not make an expensive price cheap.
| Forward P/E | 8.5x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Trailing P/E | 18.7x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | -14.9% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 4.3% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 16.8% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.61 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.84 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.78 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $456M |
| Employees | 1,096 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
IMXI trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | MAYDON LAURA I. | Director | 127 | $2,007 | |
| 2026-04-01 | BRADFORD DEBRA A. | Director | 159 | $2,512 | |
| 2026-04-01 | PURCELL MICHAEL J. | Director | 989 | $15,626 | |
| 2026-03-31 | LISY ROBERT | Chief Executive Officer | 117,500 | · | |
| 2026-02-06 | LISY ROBERT | Chief Executive Officer | 300,644 | $4,675,014 | |
| 2026-02-06 | AGUILAR JOSEPH | Officer | 38,586 | $600,012 | |
| 2026-02-06 | BENDE ANDRAS QUINN | Chief Financial Officer | 57,878 | $900,003 | |
| 2026-02-06 | HUNT CHRISTOPHER D | Chief Operating Officer | 57,878 | $900,003 | |
| 2025-12-31 | MAYDON LAURA I. | Director | 131 | $2,010 | |
| 2025-12-31 | BRADFORD DEBRA A. | Director | 163 | $2,500 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $15.81 | -7.0% | · | $930 | -7.0% |
| 2 months | $15.82 | -7.1% | · | $929 | -7.1% |
| 3 months | $15.78 | -6.8% | · | $932 | -6.8% |
| 6 months | $15.45 | -4.9% | · | $952 | -4.9% |
| 1 year | $11.15 | +31.8% | · | $1,318 | +31.8% |
| 2 years | $21.33 | -31.1% | · | $689 | -31.1% |
| 3 years | $24.44 | -39.9% | · | $602 | -39.9% |
| 5 years | $15.18 | -3.2% | · | $968 | -3.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.