Framework Journal · one stock, one dated entry

Recorded 2026-05-09 · Permanent

Ferguson Enterprises FERG.L

Clears the common standard

An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.

The label
Distribution

read at $17,170.00

Ferguson Enterprises holds its Distribution at $17,170.00.

PHINPOOPSC
  • PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
  • INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
  • POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
  • OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
  • SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
  • edge confirmed
  • edge broken
  • edge forming

Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.

The investor read · the season, not the day

As held on the ledger · 2026-05-09
PhaseDistribution · caution
Quantitative stateThe statistical read favours the sellers, held for 231 days
Price$17,170.00
Valuation23.82 trailing · 19.33 forward price to earnings
Values screenFAIL · score 10.0
BetaN/A

The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth

Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $8,585.00 fair value estimate, 3.60% revenue growth.

Read at
$17,170.00
23.82 P/E · 19.33 fwd
Our fair value
$8,585.00
50% premium

Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going

$19,908$13,827$7,746TODAY5y agoPROJECTIONConservative$8,585.00 -49%Our fair value$8,585.00 -49%

The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street

Current
$17,170.00
you are here
Conservative
$8,585.00
-50%
Our fair value
$8,585.00
-50%

Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.

Revenue growth3.60%
Profit margin0.00%
Debt to equity103.52

Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.

The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English

It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:

The common standard · AAOIFI
Used by most halal investing apps
✓ PASSES
Our stricter standard · asset-based
The one Titan applies
✗ DOES NOT PASS

Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.

What these two standards are, and how they differ →

  • Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
  • Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 33.7% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 17.6%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
  • Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 3.8% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
  • Receivables Money owed to the company is 22.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
  • Revenue purity Only 0.6% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass

Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.

The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean

Why it gives us pause

At 19.3x forward earnings, the price already runs ahead of the business. It trades 50% above our $8,585.00 fair value, so you would be buying at a premium, not a discount.

The fundamentals · plain-English read
Forward P/E19.3x
expensive even after accounting for its growth
Trailing P/E23.8x
a premium valuation
Revenue growth3.6%
slow but positive growth
Profit margin0.0%
currently unprofitable
Debt to equity1.04
a meaningful debt load worth watching
Market cap$34.6B

The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.

Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.

Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are

FERG.L trades on LSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.

The trader read · the latest dated commentary

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 6% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (5 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21738. Entered 2026-07-28 · Markdown

The dated journal · newest first, never edited

2026-07-28 Markdown $17,170.00 +0.0% Entry 4

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 6% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (5 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21738.

2026-07-18 Markdown $17,170.00 +0.0% Entry 3

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 6% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (5 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21738.

2026-07-03 Markdown $17,170.00 +0.0% Entry 2

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

2026-07-02 Markdown $17,170.00 Entry 1

The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.

Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.

The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed

Most recent filings · FERG.L
DateInsiderTitleTypeSharesValue
2026-04-30 Baker (Kelly A) 1 ·
2026-04-30 Metcalf (James) 14 ·
2025-01-06 Morrissey (Victoria) 2,000 $354,000
2024-10-21 Rees (Richard John) 208,333 $64,999
2024-10-21 Crofton (Kevin) 2,916,666 $909,999
2024-10-14 Morrissey (Victoria) 3,304 ·
2024-10-14 Morrissey (Victoria) 1,468 $295,361
2024-10-14 JACOBS MICHAEL 2,221 ·
2024-10-14 JACOBS MICHAEL 2,624 $527,450
2024-10-14 Williams (John) 2,118 ·

Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.

What holding actually paid · price plus dividends

If $1,000 had been placed · historical, not a promise
PeriodPrice thenPrice returnDivs per share$1,000 becameTotal return
1 month $17,849.08 -4.8% $66.55 $956 -4.4%
2 months $19,069.01 -10.9% $66.55 $894 -10.6%
3 months $16,889.13 +0.6% $66.55 $1,010 +1.0%
6 months $17,087.83 -0.6% $198.02 $1,006 +0.6%
1 year $16,006.77 +6.1% $321.72 $1,081 +8.1%
2 years $15,559.14 +9.2% $574.12 $1,129 +12.9%
3 years $11,523.62 +47.4% $817.12 $1,545 +54.5%
5 years $9,562.42 +77.7% $1,285.36 $1,911 +91.1%

Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever FERG.L does next, these words stay.

Ferguson Enterprises · FERG.L · Distribution · $17,170.00
Recorded 2026-05-09 · before the outcome · scored mechanically

Get our weekly market brief free.