The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 6% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (5 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21738.
Ferguson Enterprises FERG.L
Clears the common standardAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $17,170.00
Ferguson Enterprises holds its Distribution at $17,170.00.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 231 days |
| Price | $17,170.00 |
| Valuation | 23.82 trailing · 19.33 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | N/A |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $8,585.00 fair value estimate, 3.60% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
| Revenue growth | 3.60% |
| Profit margin | 0.00% |
| Debt to equity | 103.52 |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 33.7% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 17.6%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 3.8% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 22.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.6% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Why it gives us pause
At 19.3x forward earnings, the price already runs ahead of the business. It trades 50% above our $8,585.00 fair value, so you would be buying at a premium, not a discount.
| Forward P/E | 19.3x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 23.8x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 3.6% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 0.0% currently unprofitable |
| Debt to equity | 1.04 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Market cap | $34.6B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
FERG.L trades on LSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 6% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (5 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $21738.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | Baker (Kelly A) | 1 | · | ||
| 2026-04-30 | Metcalf (James) | 14 | · | ||
| 2025-01-06 | Morrissey (Victoria) | 2,000 | $354,000 | ||
| 2024-10-21 | Rees (Richard John) | 208,333 | $64,999 | ||
| 2024-10-21 | Crofton (Kevin) | 2,916,666 | $909,999 | ||
| 2024-10-14 | Morrissey (Victoria) | 3,304 | · | ||
| 2024-10-14 | Morrissey (Victoria) | 1,468 | $295,361 | ||
| 2024-10-14 | JACOBS MICHAEL | 2,221 | · | ||
| 2024-10-14 | JACOBS MICHAEL | 2,624 | $527,450 | ||
| 2024-10-14 | Williams (John) | 2,118 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $17,849.08 | -4.8% | $66.55 | $956 | -4.4% |
| 2 months | $19,069.01 | -10.9% | $66.55 | $894 | -10.6% |
| 3 months | $16,889.13 | +0.6% | $66.55 | $1,010 | +1.0% |
| 6 months | $17,087.83 | -0.6% | $198.02 | $1,006 | +0.6% |
| 1 year | $16,006.77 | +6.1% | $321.72 | $1,081 | +8.1% |
| 2 years | $15,559.14 | +9.2% | $574.12 | $1,129 | +12.9% |
| 3 years | $11,523.62 | +47.4% | $817.12 | $1,545 | +54.5% |
| 5 years | $9,562.42 | +77.7% | $1,285.36 | $1,911 | +91.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.