The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 30.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 33%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $21.
Autohome Inc. ATHM
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Autohome Inc.
read at $21.53
Autohome Inc. holds its Markup at $21.53.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 6 days |
| Price | $21.53 |
| Valuation | 15.72 trailing · 14.31 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.22 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $21.19 fair value estimate, weak competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | -27.90% |
| Profit margin | 18.01% |
| Debt to equity | 0.23 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 11 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its cash ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 2.8% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are 871.4% of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
China's Top Car Site Loses Ground Fast
Picture a Beijing driver hunting for a new car online. Autohome once owned that search, yet its revenue has fallen 28 percent while the market slowed. We pass because the business shows a weak moat, return on equity of just 4 percent and a forward multiple of 14.3 times that offers no real margin of safety at the current price.
The numbers tell a clear story of contraction rather than opportunity. Profit margins sit at 18 percent but top-line decline and thin returns on equity point to structural pressure in a market the company no longer dominates. Eleven analysts rate the shares a hold with a median target below the current level, underlining limited upside.
Cash ratio failure on the ethical screen rules the name out regardless of valuation. Currency and regulatory exposure in China add further uncertainty that a low growth profile cannot offset. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.3x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 15.7x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | -27.9% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 18.0% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 4.4% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.23 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 8.15 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.22 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $2.5B |
| Employees | 4,242 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to China and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in ATHM's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
ATHM trades on the NYSE (the company is based in China). As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 33%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $21.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | ZENG YAN | Chief Financial Officer | 2,704 | $46,968 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $19.17 | -9.3% | · | $907 | -9.3% |
| 2 months | $17.90 | -2.9% | · | $971 | -2.9% |
| 3 months | $18.75 | -7.3% | · | $927 | -7.3% |
| 6 months | $23.86 | -27.2% | · | $728 | -27.2% |
| 1 year | $25.93 | -33.0% | · | $670 | -33.0% |
| 2 years | $25.53 | -31.9% | $1.72 | $748 | -25.2% |
| 3 years | $27.01 | -35.7% | $2.87 | $750 | -25.0% |
| 5 years | $59.85 | -71.0% | $3.98 | $357 | -64.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.