The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 7.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $38.
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. APAM
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
read at $38.51
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. holds its Accumulation at $38.51.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 3 days |
| Price | $38.51 |
| Valuation | 9.65 trailing · 9.53 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.67 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
| Revenue growth | 9.30% |
| Profit margin | 23.49% |
| Debt to equity | 60.24 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 4 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Ethics block this high-ROE asset manager
Money moves from pension pots to endowments every quarter, yet Artisan Partners sits in the one sector our screen rules out on sight. Financial services alone triggers the fail, so the 72 percent ROE and 23 percent margins never get a look in. We pass for that reason alone, regardless of the 9.5 times forward earnings or 9 percent revenue growth.
The business itself shows steady client flows across mutual funds and trusts, with solid cash generation that typical peers would envy. Four analysts sit on a hold rating with a $36 median target below the current price, which already prices in modest expectations. Nothing here screams broken, yet the ethical line stays firm.
Cyclical flows tied to markets remain the obvious risk, and any downturn would squeeze fees quickly. The unknown moat adds another layer of uncertainty around long-term pricing power. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.5x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 9.7x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | 9.3% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 23.5% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 72.5% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.60 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 2.89 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.67 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $2.7B |
| Employees | 567 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in APAM's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
APAM trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $38.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $38.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $36.83 | -5.7% | $0.77 | $964 | -3.6% |
| 2 months | $36.06 | -3.7% | $0.77 | $984 | -1.6% |
| 3 months | $34.37 | +1.0% | $0.77 | $1,032 | +3.2% |
| 6 months | $39.15 | -11.3% | $2.35 | $947 | -5.3% |
| 1 year | $38.20 | -9.1% | $3.96 | $1,013 | +1.3% |
| 2 years | $35.81 | -3.0% | $7.51 | $1,179 | +17.9% |
| 3 years | $28.20 | +23.1% | $10.40 | $1,600 | +60.0% |
| 5 years | $35.17 | -1.3% | $17.54 | $1,486 | +48.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.