NAS100 29,225 +0.05%
S&P 7,676 −0.02%
GOLD $4,657 +0.41%
BTC $78,866 +0.38%
VIX 15.21 −1.55%
live tape · as of 22:30 UTC · 26 Aug
Earnings Review · 26 August 2026
National Bank of Beat the Quarter, and Still Fails Our Ethical Screen. Here’s Why We Pass.
The print
Revenue $3.90B. EPS $2.45 vs $2.30 expected.
Did the flow confirm the move?
Underlying money flow is negative: sellers in control on balance going in.
Give the business its due
The business itself is genuinely strong: revenue growing about 18%, net margins near 33%, a moderate competitive moat.
The valuation lens
Our framework labels the valuation FAIR. Fair value lands near $125 against a $157 share price, a margin of safety of about -20%. The trailing multiple sits around 19 times earnings, which only makes sense if the growth holds.
The
ethical lens, our differentiator
Fails the principled screen, Business activity. A strong business is not the same as a suitable one; for a values-conscious book this is a do-not-chase regardless of the print.
The compliant alternative
There is no direct compliant equivalent in the same industry on our screen, the honest answer is to screen a step wider rather than reach for a false substitute.
The verdict for a values-conscious investor
A beat-and-raise does not change the screen. This is a great company you can admire without owning, protection first. We do not confuse a strong quarter with a suitable holding.
This is analysis, not financial advice. Always manage your risk.
How This Entry Scores
Every level named in a session brief is scored against the next scheduled close. Nothing is edited after filing: if a level breaks, the record shows it as filed, not as corrected. The desk's full scored history sits on the track record page.
This is analysis, not financial advice. Always manage your risk.