The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 66%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (13 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $19.
Vertex, Inc. VERX
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Vertex, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides enterprise tax technology solutions for retail trade, wholesale trade, and manufacturing industries in the United States and internationally.
read at $12.80
Vertex, Inc. holds its Distribution at $12.80.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 14 days |
| Price | $12.80 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 12.32 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.82 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 11.10% |
| Profit margin | -0.84% |
| Debt to equity | 142.04 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 13 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Tax Tech Firm Loses Money Despite Cheap Valuation
Every business dreads the tangle of sales tax rules across borders and products, and Vertex built software to handle the calculations. Yet the numbers tell a different story. Revenue grows at 11 percent while the company posts a negative profit margin and negative return on equity, so the low forward multiple of 12.3 times reflects real losses rather than a bargain.
We pass because the opportunity rating is none despite a calculated margin of safety to fair value. Analyst targets sit higher, but the business has yet to turn consistent profits or prove a durable moat in enterprise tax software.
The main risk is that negative returns continue if new customers cannot offset rising costs, leaving the valuation gap unclosed even if ethical screens are cleared. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 12.3x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Revenue growth | 11.1% steady growth |
| Profit margin | -0.8% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -2.9% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 1.42 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.86 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.82 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $2.1B |
| Employees | 2,100 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in VERX's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
VERX trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $13.91 | -8.1% | · | $920 | -8.1% |
| 2 months | $10.80 | +18.4% | · | $1,184 | +18.4% |
| 3 months | $13.74 | -6.9% | · | $931 | -6.9% |
| 6 months | $19.90 | -35.7% | · | $643 | -35.7% |
| 1 year | $38.09 | -66.4% | · | $336 | -66.4% |
| 2 years | $34.11 | -62.5% | · | $375 | -62.5% |
| 3 years | $22.80 | -43.9% | · | $561 | -43.9% |
| 5 years | $19.13 | -33.1% | · | $669 | -33.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.